Outcomes Important to Patients Diagnosed with Both COPD and Sleep Apnea: Findings from the O2VERLAP Study Focus Groups.

Introduction Few studies have asked Overlap Syndrome (OS) patients what outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy are important to them, while also considering their self-reported CPAP adherence barriers and facilitators. This study conducted a series of focus groups to learn about those issues with the goal of applying these findings to the design of a larger PCORI-funded scientific study, the O2VERLAP Study. Methods People previously diagnosed with both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), who were current or recent past users of the standard therapy for each condition (i.e., supplemental oxygen and continuous positive airway pressure therapy, respectively) were included. Three qualitative focus groups were run using different communication modalities: (1) teleconference (audio only); (2) in-person; and (3) web-based. Results The focus groups included a total of 17 participants. The telephone and online focus groups resulted in more relevant and content-rich transcripts, while the in-person focus groups had far fewer excerpts able to be coded. Participants were most concerned about mask fit and comfort. Other key factors affecting CPAP use included nasal dryness and issues concerning insurance. The most important outcome to patients was daytime functioning. Discussion This work found that telephone and web-based qualitative focus groups resulted in greater topical discussions than in-person focus groups, likely due to the customary socializing that occurs in-person. The study identified (1) CPAP use barriers and facilitators that helped guide intervention development for the larger study and (2) daytime functioning as the most important outcome for patients.

[1]  Margareta Møkleby,et al.  Devoted or negotiated routes of adherence: Narratives of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea using a continuous positive airway pressure device , 2019, Nursing open.

[2]  G. Guest,et al.  How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes , 2017 .

[3]  B. Fridlund,et al.  Communication between patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and healthcare personnel during the initial visit to a continuous positive airway pressure clinic , 2017, Journal of clinical nursing.

[4]  Dorian Murariu,et al.  Trends in CPAP adherence over twenty years of data collection: a flattened curve , 2016, Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery.

[5]  Daniel J Buysse,et al.  Patient and Partner Experiences With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and CPAP Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis , 2016, Behavioral sleep medicine.

[6]  A. El‐Solh,et al.  Survival Benefit of CPAP Favors Hypercapnic Patients with the Overlap Syndrome , 2014, Lung.

[7]  A. Malhotra,et al.  Impact of CPAP use and age on mortality in patients with combined COPD and obstructive sleep apnea: the overlap syndrome. , 2013, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[8]  Shu-Min Lin,et al.  Nocturnal CPAP improves walking capacity in COPD patients with obstructive sleep apnoea , 2013, Respiratory Research.

[9]  S. Constantopoulos,et al.  Long-Term Oxygen Therapy in COPD: Factors Affecting and Ways of Improving Patient Compliance , 2011, Pulmonary medicine.

[10]  A. Malhotra,et al.  Sleep-disordered breathing and COPD: the overlap syndrome. , 2010, Respiratory care.

[11]  J. Soriano,et al.  Outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea: the overlap syndrome. , 2010, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[12]  Sonia Ancoli-Israel,et al.  Determinants of nasal CPAP compliance. , 2002, Sleep medicine.

[13]  D. Flenley Sleep in chronic obstructive lung disease. , 1985, Clinics in chest medicine.

[14]  ColinE. Sullivan,et al.  REVERSAL OF OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNOEA BY CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE APPLIED THROUGH THE NARES , 1981, The Lancet.