Marsupial and monotreme enamel structure.

We present some recent developments in our understanding of two basic questions: the origin, extent, nature and course of marsupial enamel tubules; and the characterisation of monotreme enamel, more particularly, the prismatic nature of platypus enamel. Methods used included SEM of methacrylate casts of marsupial enamel tubules, worn and cut surfaces of whole marsupial teeth, developing and erupted platypus teeth, and a well-developed molar of the newly discovered Miocene ornithorhynchid Obdurodon sp., and tandem scanning reflected light microscopy of intact marsupial teeth. We conclude that there are significant species differences with respect to prism shape, row formation and tubule disposition in marsupials and, moreover, that these features change in a consistent way through the thickness of the enamel. Consideration of enamel prism course in incisor and molar enamel of Macropus eugenii, together with the tubule casts, enables us to conclude that there is a fundamental relationship of tubule to prism in the body of marsupial enamel. This and previously reported data put beyond dispute the essential relationship of the marsupial tubule to the formative ameloblast. The enamel of Ornithorhynchus anatinus is shown to be prismatic only in part, with well-formed regular prisms not being a primary structural feature. The enamel of the fossil monotreme is prismatic and tubular and displays large areas of Pattern 2 prism packing. Monotreme enamel has been interpreted as representing a structural stage intermediate between that of known multituberculates and extant tribosphenid mammals.

[1]  T. Flannery,et al.  First Mesozoic mammal from Australia—an early Cretaceous monotreme , 1985, Nature.

[2]  G. Fosse,et al.  The microstructure of tooth enamel in multituberculate mammals , 1985 .

[3]  D. Krause,et al.  Enamel Ultrastructure of Multituberculate Mammals: An Investigation of Variability , 1985 .

[4]  A Boyde,et al.  Tandem scanning reflected light microscopy of internal features in whole bone and tooth samples , 1983, Journal of microscopy.

[5]  T. Kemp The relationships of mammals , 1983 .

[6]  A. Sahni Enamel ultrastructure of certain North American cretaceous mammals , 1979 .

[7]  W. Clemens,et al.  Mesozoic mammals : the first two-thirds of mammalian history , 1979 .

[8]  J. W. Osborn The relationship between prisms and enamel tubules in the teeth of Didelphis marsupialis, and the probable origin of the tubules. , 1974, Archives of oral biology.

[9]  K. Lester,et al.  On the nature of "fibrils" and tubules in developing enamel of the opossum, Didelphis marsupialis. , 1970, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[10]  Alan Boyde,et al.  The tandem scanning reflected light microscope , 1968 .

[11]  M. L. Watson The Extracellular Nature of Enamel in the Rat , 1960, The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology.

[12]  H. Green The Development and Morphology of the Teeth of Ornithorhynchus , 1937 .

[13]  R. Broom Dentition of Ornithorhynchus , 1935, Nature.

[14]  J. Williams Disputed Points and Unsolved Problems in the Normal and Pathological Histology of Enamel , 1923 .

[15]  C. Tomes A Manual of Dental Anatomy, Human and Comparative , 1879, Nature.

[16]  J. Mummery On the Nature of the Tubes in Marsupial Enamel, and Its Bearing upon Enamel Development , 2022 .

[17]  E. Poulton Memoirs: The True Teeth and the Horny Plates of Ornithorhynchus , 1888 .

[18]  E. Poulton II. True teeth in the young ornithorhynchus paradoxus , 2022, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[19]  John Tomes XXI. On the structure of the dental tissues of marsupial animals, and more especially of the enamel , 1849, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[20]  Evolution of Mammalian Dental Enamel , 2022 .