Constant Capacity in an Immediate Serial-Recall Task

We assessed a hypothesis that working memory capacity should include a constant number of separate mental units, or chunks (cf. Miller, 1956). Because of the practical difficulty of measuring chunks, this hypothesis has not been tested previously, despite wide attention to Miller's article. We used a training procedure to manipulate the strength of associations between pairs of words to be included in an immediate serial-recall task. Although the amount of training on associations clearly increased the availability of two-item chunks and therefore the number of items correct in list recall, the number of total chunks recalled (singletons plus two-word chunks) appeared to remain approximately constant across association strengths, supporting a hypothesis of constant capacity.

[1]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Multinomial Modeling and the Measurement of Cognitive Processes. , 1988 .

[2]  E. Bjork,et al.  Short-term order and item retention. , 1974 .

[3]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[4]  A. Healy,et al.  The effects of grouping on the learning and long-term retention of spatial and temporal information , 2003 .

[5]  J. Pine,et al.  Chunking mechanisms in human learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  K A Ericcson,et al.  Acquisition of a memory skill. , 1980, Science.

[7]  Stefan Slak,et al.  Phonemic Recoding of Digital Information. , 1970 .

[8]  W. A. Wickelgren,et al.  Rehearsal Grouping and Hierarchical Organization of Serial Position Cues in Short-Term Memory , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Michael Wilson.  MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 2001 .

[10]  John N. Towse,et al.  Developmental Sensitivity to Temporal Grouping Effects in Short-term Memory , 1999 .

[11]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Multinomial Modeling and the Measurement of Cognitive Processes , 2001 .

[12]  C. Lebiere,et al.  An integrated theory of list memory. , 1998 .

[13]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[14]  I. Pollack,et al.  Running memory span. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  B. Murdock.  Item and Order Information in Short-Term Serial Memory. , 1976 .

[16]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[17]  W. Estes,et al.  Item and order information in short-term memory: Evidence for multilevel perturbation processes. , 1981 .

[18]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Marius Usher,et al.  Neural mechanism for the magical number 4: Competitive interactions and nonlinear oscillation , 2001 .

[20]  R. Mccarthy.  Working Memory. (Oxford Psychology Series No. 11.) , 1987 .

[21]  William R. Marmie,et al.  The role of item distinctiveness in short-term recall of order information , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[22]  R. Schweickert.  A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Clive Frankish,et al.  Modality-specific grouping effects in short-term memory , 1985 .

[24]  G. Mandler.  Cognitive Psychology: An Essay in Cognitive Science , 1985 .

[25]  R. Frick.  Explanations of grouping in immediate ordered recall , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[26]  A. Parkin,et al.  Human memory , 1999, Current Biology.

[27]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[28]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[29]  J Ryan,et al.  Grouping and Short-Term Memory: Different Means and Patterns of Grouping , 1969, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  E. Vogel,et al.  Response from Luck and Vogel , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Robert Hockey,et al.  Rate of Presentation in Running Memory and Direct Manipulation of Input-Processing Strategies , 1973 .

[32]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Short-Term Forgetting of Order under Conditions of Reduced Interference , 1999 .

[33]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  The magic number and the episodic buffer , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[34]  M. Maybery,et al.  Grouping in short-term verbal memory: Is position coded temporally? , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[35]  N. F. Johnson,et al.  Hierarchical organization as a determinant of sequential learning , 1978 .

[36]  N. Burgess,et al.  Temporal Grouping Effects in Immediate Recall: A Working Memory Analysis , 1996 .

[37]  Jean Saint-Aubin,et al.  The Influence of Long-term Memory Factors on Immediate Serial Recall: An Item and Order Analysis , 1999 .

[38]  E. Tulving,et al.  Concurrent effects of contextual constraint and word frequency on immediate recall and learning of verbal material. , 1962, Canadian journal of psychology.

[39]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  Separating item from order information in short-term memory , 1974 .

[40]  A Comparison of Item and Position Probes in Short-Term Memory. , 1977 .

[41]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[42]  B. Murdock,et al.  Memory for Serial Order , 1989 .