Pulmonary vein isolation using a compliant endoscopic laser balloon ablation system in a swine model

IntroductionThe incidence of pulmonary vein reconnection and recurrent atrial fibrillation after a single catheter ablation procedure is unacceptably high. We studied the ability of a novel endoscopic laser balloon ablation system (EAS) to achieve acute and chronic pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in a swine model.MethodsEight swine underwent EAS ablation and two underwent standard radiofrequency ablation for comparison. In the EAS arm, laser energy was delivered under visual guidance around the PV antrum in overlapping 30-degree arcs. In the standard ablation arm, radiofrequency energy was delivered via a 4-mm-tip catheter. PV isolation was confirmed acutely after 30 min, and reassessed after 4–6 weeks. Animals were then sacrificed for histopathologic analysis of the PVs.ResultsFor the EAS animals, 44 ± 10 overlapping lesions were required to achieve acute RSPV isolation. Chronic PV isolation was documented with the circular mapping catheter a mean of 28 ± 9 days after ablation in 7/8 animals (83%). In the standard ablation arm, 30 ± 3 RF lesions were delivered to achieve acute PV isolation. There was evidence of PV reconnection in both animals during the chronic study. Histologically, completely transmural circumferential lesions were found in 7/8 EAS animals, with 99% circumferentiality in the remaining animal. Both control RF animals had evidence of gaps, with isolation of 90% and 75% of the targeted PV segments, respectively.ConclusionVisually guided laser ablation using light energy via a compliant balloon catheter is feasible and achieved chronic isolation in 83% of targeted PVs.

[1]  Vivek Y. Reddy,et al.  Visually-Guided Balloon Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Experimental Feasibility and First-in-Human Multicenter Clinical Outcome , 2009, Circulation.

[2]  David D Spragg,et al.  Incidence and Time Course of Early Recovery of Pulmonary Vein Conduction after Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Incidence and Location of Focal Atrial Fibrillation Triggers in Patients Undergoing Repeat Pulmonary Vein Isolation: , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[4]  A. Russo,et al.  Incidence and Predictors of Very Late Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Ablation , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[5]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Focal Ablation Versus PV Isolation Assisted by Magnetic Electroanatomic Mapping , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Atrio-Esophageal Fistula as a Complication of Percutaneous Transcatheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , 2004, Circulation.

[7]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Efficacy of Repeat Pulmonary Vein Isolation Procedures in Patients with Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  M. Haissaguerre,et al.  “Dormant” Pulmonary Vein Conduction Revealed by Adenosine after Ostial Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  F. Morady,et al.  Mechanisms of recurrent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation by segmental ostial ablation. , 2004, Heart rhythm.

[10]  David D Spragg,et al.  Long-term single procedure efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation , 2006, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.