Protective measurements: extracting the expectation value by measuring a single particle

In quantum mechanics, the eigenvalues and their corresponding probabilities specify the expectation value of a physical observable, which is known to be a statistical property related to large ensembles of particles. In contrast to this paradigm, we demonstrate a unique method allowing to extract the expectation value of a single particle, namely, the polarisation of a single protected photon, with a single experiment. This is the first realisation of quantum protective measurements.

[1]  L Vaidman,et al.  Weak value controversy , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  Maximilian Schlosshauer.  Measuring the quantum state of a single system with minimum state disturbance , 2016 .

[3]  Yuen,et al.  Impossibility of measuring the wave function of a single quantum system. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[4]  Unruh.  Reality and measurement of the wave function. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[5]  M. Genovese,et al.  Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and the measurement problem , 2010, 1002.0990.

[6]  Eliahu Cohen,et al.  Foundations and Applications Of Weak Quantum Measurements , 2014 .

[7]  A. Jordan,et al.  Significance of the imaginary part of the weak value , 2011, 1112.3986.

[8]  Onur Hosten,et al.  Observation of the Spin Hall Effect of Light via Weak Measurements , 2008, Science.

[9]  Eliahu Cohen,et al.  Can a future choice affect a past measurement’s outcome? , 2015 .

[10]  A Tosi,et al.  Experiment Investigating the Connection between Weak Values and Contextuality. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[11]  M. Genovese.  Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses , 2005, quant-ph/0701071.

[12]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  Weak value beyond conditional expectation value of the pointer readings , 2016, 1611.03989.

[13]  Bryce S. DeWitt,et al.  The Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2015 .

[14]  Shan Gao.  Protective Measurement and Quantum Reality: Towards a New Understanding of Quantum Mechanics , 2014 .

[15]  Benni Reznik,et al.  Revisiting Hardy's Paradox: Counterfactual Statements, Real Measurements, Entanglement and Weak Values , 2001 .

[16]  A. Jordan,et al.  Colloquium : Understanding quantum weak values: Basics and applications , 2013, 1305.7154.

[17]  Sleator,et al.  Experimental demonstration of the optical Stern-Gerlach effect. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[18]  H M Wiseman,et al.  Measurement of quantum weak values of photon polarization. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[19]  Lucien Hardy,et al.  ARE QUANTUM STATES REAL , 2012, 1205.1439.

[20]  Berthold-Georg Englert,et al.  PROTECTIVE MEASUREMENTS AND BOHM TRAJECTORIES , 1999 .

[21]  Shan Gao.  The meaning of the wave function , 2010 .

[22]  Marco Genovese,et al.  Practical Implementation of a Test of Event-Based Corpuscular Model as an Alternative to Quantum Mechanics , 2013 .

[23]  Alessio Avella,et al.  Investigating the Effects of the Interaction Intensity in a Weak Measurement , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Vaidman,et al.  How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[25]  A. Tosi,et al.  Determining the quantum expectation value by measuring a single photon , 2017, Nature Physics.

[26]  N. D. Hari Dass,et al.  Critique of protective measurements , 1999 .

[27]  Ritchie,et al.  Realization of a measurement of a "weak value" , 1991, Physical review letters.

[28]  E. Sudarshan,et al.  Zeno's paradox in quantum theory , 1976 .

[29]  Eric G. Cavalcanti,et al.  Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction , 2014 .

[30]  J.Samuel,et al.  Comment on ``Meaning of the Wave Function'' , 1994 .

[31]  Eliahu Cohen,et al.  Introduction to Weak Measurements and Weak Values , 2013 .

[32]  Yakir AharonovandLev Vaidman.  Measurement of the Schrodingerwaveof a single particle , 1993 .

[33]  Matthew F Pusey.  Anomalous weak values are proofs of contextuality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[34]  Marco Barbieri,et al.  Anomalous weak values and the violation of a multiple-measurement Leggett-Garg inequality , 2017 .

[35]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  The meaning of protective measurements , 1994 .

[36]  S. Popescu.  Nonlocality beyond quantum mechanics , 2014, Nature Physics.

[37]  M. Ghioni,et al.  An extremely low-noise heralded single-photon source: A breakthrough for quantum technologies , 2012, 1301.2090.

[38]  W. Brockherde,et al.  CMOS Imager With 1024 SPADs and TDCs for Single-Photon Timing and 3-D Time-of-Flight , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[39]  A Tosi,et al.  Measuring Incompatible Observables by Exploiting Sequential Weak Values. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[40]  Abner Shimony,et al.  Potentiality, entanglement and passion-at-a-distance , 1997 .

[41]  K J Resch.  Amplifying a Tiny Optical Effect , 2008, Science.

[42]  F. Piacentini,et al.  Experimental local realism tests without fair sampling assumption , 2007, 0705.0439.

[43]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  Past of a quantum particle , 2013, 1304.7474.

[44]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  Protective Measurements a , 1994, Compendium of Quantum Physics.

[45]  Jos Uffink.  How to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements , 1999 .

[46]  Robert W. Boyd,et al.  Full characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[47]  L. Vaidman,et al.  Protective Measurements of Two-State Vectors , 1997 .

[48]  Matthew F Pusey,et al.  On the reality of the quantum state , 2011, Nature Physics.

[49]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  The Schrodinger Wave is Observable after All , 1993 .

[50]  Renato Renner,et al.  Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality? , 2011, Physical review letters.