The KDE+ software: a tool for effective identification and ranking of animal-vehicle collision hotspots along networks

ContextObjective identification of locations on transportation networks, where animal-vehicle collisions (AVC) occur more frequently than expected (hotspots), is an important step for the effective application of mitigation measures.ObjectivesWe introduce the KDE+ software which is a programmed version of the KDE+ method for effective identification of traffic accident hotspots. The software can be used in order to analyze animal-vehicle collision data.MethodsThe KDE+ method is based on principles of Kernel Density Estimation (KDE). The symbol ‘+’ indicates that the method allows for the objective selection of significant clusters and for the ranking of the hotspots. It is also simultaneously applicable to an unlimited number of road segments.ResultsWe applied the KDE+ method to the entire Czech road network. The hotspots were ranked according to their significance. The resulting hotspots represent a short overall road length which should require a more detailed assessment in the field. The 100 most important clusters of AVC represent, for example, only 19.7 km of the entire road network (37,469 km).ConclusionsWe present an objective method for hotspots identification which can be used for AVC data. This method is unique because it determines the significance level of hotspots in an objective way. The prioritization of hotspots allows a transportation manager to effectively allocate resources to a feasible number of identified hotspots. We describe the software, data preparation and present the KDE+ application to AVC data.

[1]  F. Slater.  An assessment of wildlife road casualties-the potential discrepancy between numbers counted and numbers killed using conventional census , 2002 .

[2]  Frederick Maurice Slater,et al.  An assessment of wildlife road casulties – the potential discrepancy between numbers counted and numbers killed , 2002 .

[3]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  Characteristics of vehicle-animal crashes in which vehicle occupants are killed , 2005 .

[4]  Craig Caulfield,et al.  Spatial and temporal visualisation techniques for crash analysis. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  T. A. Langen,et al.  Road mortality in freshwater turtles: identifying causes of spatial patterns to optimize road planning and mitigation , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[6]  I. Spellerberg.  Ecological effects of roads and traffic: a literature review , 1998 .

[7]  J. Bailey,et al.  Distribution of Mule Deer and Elk in Relation to Roads , 1979 .

[8]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Characterizing Moose–Vehicle Collision Hotspots in Northern British Columbia , 2014 .

[9]  A. D. Geis,et al.  EFFECTS OF ROADS ON SMALL MAMMALS , 1983 .

[10]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Comparison of planar and network K-functions in traffic accident analysis , 2004 .

[11]  J M Conn,et al.  Nonfatal motor-vehicle animal crash-related injuries -- United States, 2001-2002. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[12]  A. Kindel,et al.  Vertebrate road mortality estimates: Effects of sampling methods and carcass removal , 2013 .

[13]  A. Seiler,et al.  Road mortality in Swedish mammals: results of a drivers' questionnaire , 2004, Wildlife Biology.

[14]  Tanja Popovic,et al.  Nonfatal motor-vehicle animal crash-related injuries--United States, 2001-2002. , 2004, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[15]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety , 1997 .

[16]  Jun Yan,et al.  Kernel Density Estimation of traffic accidents in a network space , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[17]  Ali S Al-Ghamdi,et al.  Warning signs as countermeasures to camel-vehicle collisions in Saudi Arabia. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  H Summala,et al.  Deer-vehicle crashes: extensive peak at 1 hour after sunset. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  Thorsten Gust,et al.  Modeling of Selenoprotein Nitrozation: Synthetic Approaches , 2005 .

[20]  George A. Conway,et al.  Characteristics of Moose-vehicle Collisions in Anchorage, Alaska, 1991–1995 , 1999 .

[21]  F. Beaudry,et al.  Identifying road mortality threat at multiple spatial scales for semi-aquatic turtles , 2008 .

[22]  R. Courtois,et al.  Temporal and spatial distribution of moose-vehicle accidents in the Laurentides Wildlife Reserve, Quebec, Canada , 2006 .

[23]  Modeling the indirect effects of road networks on the foraging activities of bats , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  R. Jensen,et al.  The spatial ecology of deer–vehicle collisions , 2009 .

[25]  Peter J. Rowden,et al.  Road crashes involving animals in Australia. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  H B Graves,et al.  Distribution and Activity of White-Tailed Deer along an Interstate Highway , 1975 .

[27]  Spatial road disturbance index (SPROADI) for conservation planning: a novel landscape index, demonstrated for the State of Brandenburg, Germany , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[29]  Richard Andrášik,et al.  Identification of hazardous road locations of traffic accidents by means of kernel density estimation and cluster significance evaluation. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Giorgos Mountrakis,et al.  Spatial wildlife-vehicle collision models: a review of current work and its application to transportation mitigation projects. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  Simon Washington,et al.  Proactive detection of high collision concentration locations on highways , 2011 .

[32]  Enrique Valero,et al.  Temporal pattern of wild ungulate-related traffic accidents in northwest Spain , 2012, Zeitschrift f\ ur Jagdwissenschaft.

[33]  Atsuyuki Okabe,et al.  The K-Function Method on a Network and Its Computational Implementation , 2010 .