Numerical studies of flow through a windbreak

Abstract The pattern of flow through a porous windbreak has been investigated numerically using several well-known closure schemes (turbulence models). The shelter is included as a momentum extraction term in the streamwise momentum equation, for a fence having the value k r u | u |δ(x,0)s(z,H) where k r is the pressure-loss coefficient of the fence, ū is the local mean horizontal ( x ) velocity, δ ( x ,0) is the delta function and s ( z , H ) is a unit step function which is zero for heights ( z ) greater than the fence height, H . Previous experiments on neutrally stratified surface-layer flow through a porous fence were numerically simulated. Very good agreement with the observed velocity deficit in the near wake ( x ⩽ 15 H where H = fence height) of the fence was obtained using a Reynolds-stress closure scheme. The predictions of the “k-ϵ” closure scheme (which includes turbulent kinetic energy and energy dissipation rate equations to estimate the eddy viscosity) and the simplest scheme tested, eddy viscosity K = K 0 = ku ∗0 z eddy viscosity at all downwind distances equal to its value far upstream ku ∗0 z where k = von Karman's constant, u ∗o = friction velocity , z = height ) were only slightly less satisfactory. Satisfactory estimates of the pattern of turbulent kinetic energy behind the fence were obtained. All simulations failed to predict the sharp speedup observed over the fence, and consequently yielded a slower rate of recovery towards equilibrium than observed. Attempts to improve prediction of the speed-over and the far wake by including corrections for mean streamline curvature were unsuccessful. Design aids for isolated windbreaks have been generated from the prediction of the second-order closure model. These give the velocity reduction to be expected in the near wake of the fence and the drag on the fence for a range of values of the fence pressure-loss coefficient, k rmr .

[1]  M. Perera,et al.  Shelter behind two-dimensional solid and porous fences , 1981 .

[2]  N. Wilson,et al.  A Higher Order Closure Model for Canopy Flow , 1977 .

[3]  L. J. Hagen,et al.  Turbulent Velocity Fluctuations and Vertical Flow as Affected by Windbreak Porosity , 1971 .

[4]  M. Raupach,et al.  Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies , 1982 .

[5]  W. D. Baines An Investigation of Flow Through Screen , 1951 .

[6]  J. Hunt,et al.  Air flow and dispersion in rough terrain: a report on Euromech 173 , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  Development of velocity and shear stress distribution in the wake of a porous shelter fence , 1983 .

[8]  B. Launder,et al.  Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  B. Launder,et al.  Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  George L. Mellor,et al.  Analytic Prediction of the Properties of Stratified Planetary Surface Layers , 1973 .

[11]  D. C. Stevenson,et al.  Wind protection by model fences in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer , 1977 .

[12]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[13]  Ido Seginer,et al.  Windbreak drag calculated from the horizontal velocity field , 1972 .

[14]  J. P. V. Doormaal,et al.  ENHANCEMENTS OF THE SIMPLE METHOD FOR PREDICTING INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID FLOWS , 1984 .

[15]  Peter N. Joubert,et al.  The form drag of two-dimensional bluff-plates immersed in turbulent boundary layers , 1968, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  P. Bradshaw Effects of Streamline Curvature on Turbulent Flow. , 1973 .

[17]  L. J. Hagen,et al.  Simulation of Effect of Wind Barriers on Airflow , 1980 .

[18]  Erich J. Plate,et al.  The aerodynamics of shelter belts , 1971 .

[19]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  THE TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY BUDGET BEHIND A POROUS BARRIER: AN ANALYSIS IN STREAMLINE CO-ORDINATES , 1983 .

[20]  P. Bradshaw,et al.  The analogy between streamline curvature and buoyancy in turbulent shear flow , 1969, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  The calculation of near-wake flows , 1976, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  Taichi Maki,et al.  Studies on the Windbreak Nets , 1982 .

[23]  Brian Launder,et al.  Sensitizing the Dissipation Equation to Irrotational Strains , 1980 .

[24]  E. M. Laws,et al.  Flow Through Screens , 1978 .

[25]  G. W. Thurtell,et al.  Statistics of atmospheric turbulence within and above a corn canopy , 1982 .

[26]  C. H. Priddin,et al.  The calculation of turbulent boundary layers on spinning and curved surfaces , 1977 .

[27]  Calculation of General Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layers , 1978 .

[28]  W. D. Baines,et al.  An Investigation of Flow Through Screens , 1951, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[29]  Yasushi Ogawa,et al.  Surface roughness and thermal stratification effects on the flow behind a two-dimensional fence—I. Field study , 1980 .

[30]  P. S. Jackson,et al.  Wakes behind two-dimensional surface obstacles in turbulent boundary layers , 1974, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.