Are QALYs based on time trade-off comparable?--A systematic review of TTO methodologies.

A wide range of methods is used to elicit quality-of-life weights of different health states to generate 'Quality-adjusted life years' (QALYs). The comparability between different types of health outcomes at a numerical level is the main advantage of using a 'common currency for health' such as the QALY. It has been warned that results of different methods and perspectives should not be directly compared in QALY league tables. But do we know that QALYs are comparable if they are based on the same method and perspective?The Time trade-off (TTO) consists in a hypothetical trade-off between living shorter and living healthier. We performed a literature review of the TTO methodology used to elicit quality-of-life weights for own, current health. Fifty-six journal articles, with quality-of-life weights assigned to 102 diagnostic groups were included. We found extensive differences in how the TTO question was asked. The time frame varied from 1 month to 30 years, and was not reported for one-fourth of the weights. The samples in which the quality-of-life weights were elicited were generally small with a median size of 53 respondents. Comprehensive inclusion criteria were given for half the diagnostic groups. Co-morbidity was described in less than one-tenth of the groups of respondents. For two-thirds of the quality-of-life weights, there was no discussion of the influence of other factors, such as age, sex, employment and children. The different methodological approaches did not influence the TTO weights in a predictable or clear pattern. Whether or not it is possible to standardise the TTO method and the sampling procedure, and whether or not the TTO will then give valid quality-of-life weights, remains an open question.This review of the TTO elicited on own behalf, shows that limiting cost-utility analysis to include only quality life weights from one method and one perspective is not enough to ensure that QALYs are comparable.

[1]  E. Nord,et al.  Methods for quality adjustment of life years. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[2]  M. Johannesson,et al.  The Validity of QALYs , 1997, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  M K Goldstein,et al.  What Should Be Reported in a Methods Section on Utility Assessment? , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  J. de Haes,et al.  Tradeoffs between Quality and Quantity of Life , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  J. Kenneth Buckingham,et al.  Comparing Three Versions of the Time Tradeoff , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  C. Green,et al.  On the societal value of health care: what do we know about the person trade-off technique? , 2001, Health economics.

[7]  O. Norheim,et al.  Quantifying quality of life for economic analysis: time out for time trade off , 2003, Medical humanities.

[8]  S. Jansen,et al.  Unstable Preferences: , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[9]  E F Cook,et al.  Health values of hospitalized patients 80 years or older. HELP Investigators. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project. , 1998, JAMA.

[10]  Roger B. Davis,et al.  Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of Initiating Dialysis and Continuing Aggressive Care in Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  P. Dolan,et al.  Mapping visual analogue scale health state valuations onto standard gamble and time trade-off values. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[12]  P. Dolan,et al.  The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. , 1996, Health economics.

[13]  P. Dolan,et al.  Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. , 1996, Journal of health economics.

[14]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Individual Utilities Are Inconsistent with Rationing Choices , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  S. Anand,et al.  Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review. , 1997, Journal of health economics.

[16]  E. Elbasha,et al.  Preferences and person trade-offs: forcing consistency or inconsistency in health-related quality of life measures? , 2003, Health economics.

[17]  P. Dolan,et al.  Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: what lies behind the numbers? , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[18]  J D Habbema,et al.  The "utility" of the Time Trade-Off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional Trade-Off. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  L. Lenert,et al.  The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher Disease , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[20]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Preferences for Health Outcomes , 1984, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[21]  M. Trommald,et al.  Roughly right or precisely wrong? Systematic review of quality-of-life weights elicited with the time trade-off method , 2004, Journal of health services research & policy.

[22]  P J Neumann,et al.  An Off-the-Shelf Help List , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[23]  Z. Cohen,et al.  Quality of life of patients with ulcerative colitis preoperatively and postoperatively. , 1991, Gastroenterology.

[24]  R. Klein,et al.  The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[25]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  Functioning and utility for current health of patients with depression or chronic medical conditions in managed, primary care practices. , 1999, Archives of general psychiatry.

[26]  D. Zinner,et al.  Are Methods for Estimating QALYs in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Improving? , 1997, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[27]  L. Kapiriri,et al.  Can the value choices in DALYs influence global priority-setting? , 2004, Health policy.

[28]  D A Redelmeier,et al.  Variability among methods to assess patients' well-being and consequent effect on a cost-effectiveness analysis. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  F. J. Fowler,et al.  The Role of Reluctance to Give Up life in the Measurement of the Values of Health states , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[30]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Health-state utilities in a general population in relation to age, gender and socioeconomic factors , 1999 .

[31]  M. Johannesson,et al.  The impact of hormone replacement therapy on quality of life and willingness to pay , 1996, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[32]  E. Nord,et al.  The value of DALY life: problems with ethics and validity of disability adjusted life years , 1999, BMJ.

[33]  L. Lenert,et al.  The Effect of Search Procedures on Utility Elicitations , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[34]  A Laupacis,et al.  The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  A. Campbell,et al.  A comparison of time trade-off and quality of life measures in patients with advanced cancer , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[36]  G W Torrance,et al.  Measuring the wellbeing of family caregivers using the time trade-off technique. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.