RF emitter localization and beam pattern auto-calibration using amplitude comparison of a two-element array

Amplitude comparison is an efficient method to find the direction of arrival (DOA) of a radio frequency (RF) emitter. However, the DOA accuracy obtained by this method is usually poor due to beam pattern distortion. This paper provides a localization and beam pattern auto-calibration method, which estimates a RF emitter position and antenna beam pattern distortion simultaneously. The problem is formulated as a nonlinear dynamic estimation problem with an augmented state of emitter position and antenna distortion parameter. The state is directly estimated from the amplitude outputs of a two-element array. A multiple model unscented Kalman filter (MM-UKF) consisting of multiple initial states is proposed. It can adapt to different beam pattern distortion levels automatically. The algorithm is tested on a simulated antenna system. The results show that the MM-UKF outperforms the single model UKFs, and provides stable root mean square errors (RMSE) on different distortion levels.

[1]  L. Imsland,et al.  Constrained state estimation using the Unscented Kalman Filter , 2008, 2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[2]  Thomas B. Schön,et al.  2015 IEEE 6th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing, CAMSAP 2015 , 2016 .

[3]  Rong Yang,et al.  RF Emitter Geolocation using Amplitude Comparison with Auto-Calibrated Relative Antenna Gains , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[5]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  A Bayesian approach to auto-calibration for parametric array signal processing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Stephen E. Lipsky,et al.  Microwave Passive Direction Finding , 1987 .

[7]  Barry Leiner An Analysis and Comparison of Energy Direction Finding Systems , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[8]  Anthony J. Weiss,et al.  Array shape calibration using eigenstructure methods , 1991, Signal Process..

[9]  L. Bullock,et al.  An Analysis of Wide-Band Microwave Monopulse Direction-Finding Techniques , 1971, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  Kristine L. Bell,et al.  Array self calibration with large sensor position errors , 1999, Conference Record of the Thirty-Third Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers (Cat. No.CH37020).

[11]  C. Brinegar Passive direction finding: combining amplitude and phase based methods , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. NAECON 2000. Engineering Tomorrow (Cat. No.00CH37093).

[12]  E. Boch,et al.  Direction-finding performance of a Ka-band ESM receiver , 1994, IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters.

[13]  M.A. Ezz-El-Arab,et al.  Second order discriminant function for amplitude comparison monopulse , 1990, 7th IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology.