MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS’ METACOGNITIVE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT SCIENCE READING AND SCIENCE TEXT: AN INTERVIEW STUDY

Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine middle school students’ (grades 4 to 8) metacognitive knowledge about science reading, science text, and science reading strategies. The 52 subjects were selected from 532 students who completed a survey instrument designed to determine students’ knowledge about science reading, science text, and science reading strategies. The stratified randomly sampled students were interviewed using five structured protocols. The protocol items were based on 21 strategic characteristics of successful readers of science text and three domains of metacognitive knowledge: declarative, procedural, and conditional. Quantitative analyses reveal surface level metacognitive knowledge about 20 of 21 strategies explored and similar levels of knowledge across the three metacognitive domains. A qualitative analysis indicates that average middle school students’ metacognitive knowledge of science reading, science text, and science reading strategies is similar to that of younger ...

[1]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Teaching Readers about the Structure of Scientific Text. , 1988 .

[2]  S. Paris,et al.  The benefits of informed instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills. , 1984 .

[3]  Shirley A. Wagoner.  Comprehension Monitoring: What It Is and What We Know About It. , 1983 .

[4]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Strategies That Improve Children's Memory and Comprehension of Text , 1989, The Elementary School Journal.

[5]  Maribeth Cassidy Schmitt,et al.  A Questionnaire to Measure Children's Awareness of Strategic Reading Processes. , 1990 .

[6]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction , 1991 .

[7]  R. Garner.  Metacognition and reading comprehension , 1987 .

[8]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Reading in science: Developing an operational conception to guide instruction , 1991 .

[9]  S. Carey.  Cognitive science and science education. , 1986 .

[10]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Explicit Comprehension Instruction: A Review of Research and a New Conceptualization of Instruction , 1987, The Elementary School Journal.

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[12]  Four Measures of Topical Knowledge: A Study of Construct Validity. , 1990 .

[13]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Implementing Change in Secondary Science Reading and Textbook Useage: A Desired Image, a Current Profile, and a Plan for Change. , 1989 .

[14]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Cognition for Interpreting Scientific Concepts: A Study of Acceleration , 1992 .

[15]  The text, the student, and the teacher: Learning from exposition in middle schools , 1986 .

[16]  Ann L. Brown.  Knowing When, Where, and How to Remember: A Problem of Metacognition. Technical Report No. 47. , 1977 .

[17]  H. Walberg,et al.  Can Comprehension Be Taught? , 1988 .

[18]  Ruth Garner,et al.  Good and Poor Comprehender Differences in Knowing and Regulating Reading Behaviors. , 1981 .

[19]  J. Wandersee.  Ways Students Read Texts. , 1988 .

[20]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Review of Reading Comprehension Instruction: 1985-1991. , 1992 .

[21]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Reading, Understanding, Remembering and Using Information in Written Science Materials. , 1985 .

[22]  P. Moore.  Children's Metacognitive Knowledge about Reading: A Selected Review. , 1982 .

[23]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning science: A generative process , 1983 .

[24]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Overview: Students' models and epistemologies of science , 1991 .

[25]  Sharon Benge Kletzien,et al.  Strategy Use by Good and Poor Comprehenders Reading Expository Text of Differing Levels. , 1991 .

[26]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Comprehension and Teaching: Research Reviews. , 1981 .

[27]  Larry D. Yore.  An Assessment of What Grade 5 Students Know about Science Text and Science Reading. A Preliminary Report. , 1990 .

[28]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[29]  J. Flavell.  Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[30]  M. Ferguson-Hessler,et al.  Studying Physics Texts: Differences in Study Processes Between Good and Poor Performers , 1990 .

[31]  L. Yore,et al.  Reading Comprehension and Metacognition in Science: Status, Potential and Future Direction. , 1992 .

[32]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[33]  Ruth Garner,et al.  Verbal-Report Data on Reading Strategies , 1982 .

[34]  Peter N. Winograd.  Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts , 1984 .

[35]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[36]  S. Paris,et al.  Children's Metacognition About Reading: issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction , 1987 .

[37]  Laura R. Roehler,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Measures Associated with Strategic Reading , 1987 .

[38]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Novice Strategies for Processing Scientific Texts. , 1986 .

[39]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Novice rules for assessing importance in scientific texts , 1988 .