OSLG: A new granting scheme in WDM Ethernet passive optical networks

Abstract Several granting schemes have been proposed to grant transmission window and dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) in passive optical networks (PON). Generally, granting schemes suffer from bandwidth wastage of granted windows. Here, we propose a new granting scheme for WDM Ethernet PONs, called optical network unit (ONU) Side Limited Granting (OSLG) that conserves upstream bandwidth, thus resulting in decreasing queuing delay and packet drop ratio. In OSLG instead of optical line terminal (OLT), each ONU determines its transmission window. Two OSLG algorithms are proposed in this paper: the OSLG_GA algorithm that determines the size of its transmission window in such a way that the bandwidth wastage problem is relieved, and the OSLG_SC algorithm that saves unused bandwidth for more bandwidth utilization later on. The OSLG can be used as granting scheme of any DBA to provide better performance in the terms of packet drop ratio and queuing delay. Our performance evaluations show the effectiveness of OSLG in reducing packet drop ratio and queuing delay under different DBA techniques.

[1]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Media access control for Ethernet passive optical networks: an overview , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Jong-Tae Lim,et al.  Dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm in Ethernet passive optical networks , 2003 .

[3]  Glen Kramer,et al.  Ethernet passive optical network (EPON): building a next-generation optical access network , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[4]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Interleaved Polling with Adaptive Cycle Time (IPACT): A Dynamic Bandwidth Distribution Scheme in an Optical Access Network , 2004, Photonic Network Communications.

[5]  Hyunseung Choo,et al.  Double-Phase Polling Algorithm Based on Partitioned ONU Subgroups for High Utilization in EPONs , 2009, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[6]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  WDM Ethernet passive optical networks , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Wang-Rong Chang,et al.  An analytical framework for a WDM EPON with differentiated services , 2009, 2009 Fourth International Conference on Communications and Networking in China.

[8]  Mohammad S. Obaidat,et al.  IGFS: A New MAC Protocol Exploiting Heterogeneous Propagation Delays in the Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation on WDM-EPON , 2010, IEEE Systems Journal.

[9]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Ethernet passive optical networks , 2005 .

[10]  Radim Bartos,et al.  Analysis of the Gated IPACT Scheme for EPONs , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[11]  T. Holmberg Analysis of EPONs under the static priority scheduling scheme with fixed transmission times , 2006, 2006 2nd Conference on Next Generation Internet Design and Engineering, 2006. NGI '06..

[12]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Working Documents , 2004, PCM.

[13]  Maode Ma,et al.  IPACT With Grant Estimation (IPACT-GE) Scheme for Ethernet Passive Optical Networks , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[14]  M. Maier,et al.  Dynamic Wavelength and Bandwidth Allocation in Hybrid TDM/WDM EPON Networks , 2007, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[15]  Akbar Ghaffarpour Rahbar,et al.  Multi group dynamic bandwidth allocation scheme in long reach PONs , 2010 .

[16]  Ahmad R. Dhaini,et al.  Quality of Service in TDM/WDM Ethernet Passive Optical Networks (EPONs) , 2006, 11th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC'06).

[17]  M. Scheutzow,et al.  Just-in-Time Scheduling for Multichannel EPONs , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[18]  Akbar Ghaffarpour Rahbar,et al.  NFS: A new DBA to alleviate channel idle time in heterogeneous WDM-EPONs , 2010, 2010 5th International Symposium on Telecommunications.

[19]  Michael Scheutzow,et al.  Delay analysis of Ethernet passive optical networks with gated service , 2008 .

[20]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Long-reach optical access networks: A survey of research challenges, demonstrations, and bandwidth assignment mechanisms , 2010, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[21]  Roberto de Marca,et al.  Society news - Candidates announced for board of governors , 2004, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[22]  I. Andonovic,et al.  Dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm for differentiated sservices over WDM EPONs , 2004, The Ninth International Conference onCommunications Systems, 2004. ICCS 2004..

[23]  Ahmet B. Keha,et al.  Bandwidth management for WDM EPONs , 2006 .

[24]  Sudhir S. Dixit,et al.  Dynamic bandwidth allocation for quality-of-service over Ethernet PONs , 2003, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[25]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Ethernet PONs: a survey of dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) algorithms , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[26]  Wang-Rong Chang,et al.  Design and Analysis of a WDM EPON for Supporting Private Networking and Differentiated Services , 2010, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[27]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Ethernet passive optical network architectures and dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithms , 2008, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[28]  Nirwan Ansari,et al.  Limited sharing with traffic prediction for dynamic bandwidth allocation and QoS provisioning over Ethernet passive optical networks , 2005 .

[29]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Ethernet PON (ePON): Design and Analysis of an Optical Access Network , 2001, Photonic Network Communications.

[30]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Shortest propagation delay (SPD) first scheduling for EPONs with heterogeneous propagation delays , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.