Computer simulations reveal motor properties generating stable antiparallel microtubule interactions

An aster of microtubules is a set of flexible polar filaments with dynamic plus ends that irradiate from a common location at which the minus ends of the filaments are found. Processive soluble oligomeric motor complexes can bind simultaneously to two microtubules, and thus exert forces between two asters. Using computer simulations, I have explored systematically the possible steady-state regimes reached by two asters under the action of various kinds of oligomeric motors. As expected, motor complexes can induce the asters to fuse, for example when the complexes consist only of minus end–directed motors, or to fully separate, when the motors are plus end directed. More surprisingly, complexes made of two motors of opposite directionalities can also lead to antiparallel interactions between overlapping microtubules that are stable and sustained, like those seen in mitotic spindle structures. This suggests that such heterocomplexes could have a significant biological role, if they exist in the cell.

[1]  J. V. José,et al.  A dynamical model of kinesin-microtubule motility assays. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Torsten Wittmann,et al.  The spindle: a dynamic assembly of microtubules and motors , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[3]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Spiral defects in motility assays: A measure of motor protein force. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[4]  R. Walker,et al.  Identification of microtubule binding sites in the Ncd tail domain. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[5]  A C Maggs,et al.  Diffusion and formation of microtubule asters: physical processes versus biochemical regulation. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Timothy J. Mitchison,et al.  Eg5 is static in bipolar spindles relative to tubulin , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  E. Salmon,et al.  How the transition frequencies of microtubule dynamic instability (nucleation, catastrophe, and rescue) regulate microtubule dynamics in interphase and mitosis: analysis using a Monte Carlo computer simulation. , 1993, Molecular biology of the cell.

[8]  Steven M. Block,et al.  Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules , 1994, Cell.

[9]  H. Berg.  Random Walks in Biology , 2018 .

[10]  A. Hyman,et al.  Morphogenetic Properties of Microtubules and Mitotic Spindle Assembly , 1996, Cell.

[11]  References , 1971 .

[12]  I. Vernos,et al.  The Mitotic Spindle: A Self-Made Machine , 2001, Science.

[13]  R. Leighton,et al.  Feynman Lectures on Physics , 1971 .

[14]  Y. Hiramoto,et al.  Rheological properties of sea urchin eggs. , 1970, Biorheology.

[15]  R. Baskin,et al.  A bipolar kinesin , 1996, Nature.

[16]  François Nédélec,et al.  Dynamics of microtubule aster formation by motor complexes , 2001 .

[17]  K. Sekimoto,et al.  Polarity Sorting in a Bundle of Actin Filaments by Two-Headed Myosins , 1996 .

[18]  A C Maggs,et al.  Dynamic concentration of motors in microtubule arrays. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[19]  Takuji Nishimura,et al.  Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator , 1998, TOMC.

[20]  E. Nigg,et al.  Phosphorylation by p34cdc2 Protein Kinase Regulates Binding of the Kinesin-related Motor HsEg5 to the Dynactin Subunit p150Glued * , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  S. Leibler,et al.  Self-organization of microtubules and motors , 1997, Nature.

[22]  Russell J. Stewart,et al.  The kinesin-like ncd protein of Drosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor , 1990, Cell.

[23]  J. Howard,et al.  The force exerted by a single kinesin molecule against a viscous load. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[24]  E. Salmon,et al.  Microtubule dynamics: Treadmilling comes around again , 1997, Current Biology.

[25]  S. Leibler,et al.  Assembly and positioning of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  L. Wordeman,et al.  How motor proteins influence microtubule polymerization dynamics. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[27]  S. Ishiwata,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent single- to double-headed binding of kinesin. , 2001, Science.

[28]  J. Scholey,et al.  Antagonistic microtubule-sliding motors position mitotic centrosomes in Drosophila early embryos , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[29]  M. Schilstra,et al.  A simple formulation of microtubule dynamics: quantitative implications of the dynamic instability of microtubule populations in vivo and in vitro. , 1989, Journal of cell science.

[30]  J. Howard,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2001 .

[31]  S. Leibler,et al.  Physical Properties Determining Self-Organization of Motors and Microtubules , 2001, Science.

[32]  S. Leibler,et al.  Influence of M-phase chromatin on the anisotropy of microtubule asters , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  F. Jülicher,et al.  Actively contracting bundles of polar filaments. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[34]  H Tashiro,et al.  Buckling of a single microtubule by optical trapping forces: direct measurement of microtubule rigidity. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.