Tomographic imaging of trickle-bed reactors

Abstract Trickle-bed reactors are used for a number of different reaction applications in chemical engineering processing. Among these applications hydrodesulfurization and hydrotreatment are the most common. For certain operating parameters of the reactor, the flow through the packing becomes instable and the pulse flow regime is established. In this regime, the mass transfer as well as the pressure drop is increased. In order to able to operate commercial plants safely in this operating regime, the physical reasons for the onset and the physical properties of the pulsing itself need to be known. The true physical mechanisms are especially important since the experimental investigations are usually carried out in experimental facilities much below technical size. In order to investigate the pulse flow in irregular packings, capacitance tomography was used. The imaging frequency of the system is 100Hz and the spatial resolution 0,1%. The investigations were performed at ambiant pressure in a 120mm diameter plant using air and water as the gas and liquid phase, respectively. The results indicate a strong three-dimensional distribution of the gas and the liquid phase inside the column. The liquid rich zones, appearing to be plane from the outside, show a non-uniform distribution inside the packing. Due to the small diameter of the column an influence of the walls was determined, which will not be found in larger size technical scale plants.

[1]  Sankaran Sundaresan,et al.  Effect of boundaries on trickle‐bed hydrodynamics , 1991 .

[2]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Pressure drop, liquid holdup, and flow regime transition in trickle flow , 1993 .

[3]  E. Talmor,et al.  Two‐phase downflow through catalyst beds: Part I. Flow maps , 1977 .

[4]  Ka Ming Ng,et al.  A model for flow regime transitions in cocurrent down‐flow trickle‐bed reactors , 1986 .

[5]  Elio Santacesaria,et al.  Synthesis of Epichlorohydrin by Elimination of Hydrogen Chloride from Chlorohydrins. 1. Kinetic Aspects of the Process , 1979 .

[6]  Y. Varma,et al.  Flow pattern of the phases and liquid saturation in gas‐liquid concurrent downflow through packed beds , 1988 .

[7]  Sankaran Sundaresan,et al.  Onset of pulsing in two‐phase cocurrent downflow through a packed bed , 1988 .

[8]  N. Midoux,et al.  Hydrodynamics and gas-liquid-solid interfacial parameters of co-current downward two-phase flow in trickle-bed reactors , 1984 .

[9]  K. Kan,et al.  Multiple Hydrodynamic States in Cocurrent Two-Phase Downflow through Packed Beds , 1978 .

[10]  Vito Specchia,et al.  Trickle-bed reactors: state of art and perspectives , 1992 .

[11]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  A phenomenological model for pressure drop, liquid holdup, and flow regime transition in gas-liquid trickle flow , 1992 .

[12]  D. Luss,et al.  Transition to Pulsed Flow in Mixed-Phase Cocurrent Downflow through a Fixed Bed , 1977 .

[13]  V. Specchia,et al.  Hydrodynamics and solid‐liquid contacting effectiveness in trickle‐bed reactors , 1978 .