Playing Games with International Relations

After reviewing the advantages and disadvantages in using simulations to teach International Relations, this paper develops pedagogy for using simulations to teach International Relations (IR) theory. After discussing methods for integrating simulations into a class on IR theory the paper then goes on to present three simulations and the theories that they can be used to teach. The three simulations are the Classical Realism Game, Prisoner’s Dilemma to the N th degree, and Diplomacy. Finally, the three simulations are compared.

[1]  Jeffrey S. Lantis,et al.  The new international studies classroom : active teaching, active learning , 2000 .

[2]  Barbara Steinwachs.  How to Facilitate a Debriefing , 1992 .

[3]  Eleanor E. Zeff.  Negotiating in the European Council: A Model European Union Format for Individual Classes , 2003 .

[4]  Vicki L. Golich,et al.  The ABCs of Case Teaching , 2000 .

[5]  David Crookall,et al.  Developing a Scientific Knowledge of Simulation/Gaming , 1998 .

[6]  Elizabeth Christopher,et al.  Simulations and Games as Subversive Activities , 1999 .

[7]  A. J. Faria.  Business Simulation Games: Current Usage Levels—An Update , 1998 .

[8]  S. Flynn.  Drug Trafficking, the International System, and Decision-Making Constraints: A Policy-Making Simulation , 2000 .

[9]  Torney-Purta.  Evaluating Programs Designed to Teach International Content and Negotiation Skills , 1998 .

[10]  J. Potters,et al.  Assessing the efficacy of gaming in economics education. , 1997 .

[11]  Robert Axelrod,et al.  Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions , 1985, World Politics.

[12]  Mark A. Boyer,et al.  Negotiating a Complex World: An Introduction to International Negotiation , 1999 .

[13]  Alexander Wendt,et al.  La anarquía es lo que los estados hacen de ella:la construcción social de la política de poder | Anarchy is what states make of it: the Social Construction of Power Politics , 2005 .

[14]  H. Richard Friman.  The Crisis Game , 1991 .

[15]  Bob Switky.  Party Strategies and Electoral Systems: Simulating Coalition Governments , 2004, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[16]  Ken Jones.  Simulations as Examinations , 1982 .

[17]  Brent D. Ruben,et al.  Simulations, Games, and Experience-Based Learning: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Teaching and Learning , 1999 .

[18]  Douglas A. Van Belle,et al.  Balance of Power and System Stability: Simulating Complex Anarchical Environments Over the Internet , 1998 .

[19]  S. Bremer.  Dangerous Dyads , 1992 .

[20]  Rebecca W. Black,et al.  Three Levels of Learning in Simulations: Participating, Debriefing, and Journal Writing , 1992 .

[21]  Frederick B. King,et al.  Constructivist Pedagogy and How We Learn: Educational Psychology Meets International Studies , 2000 .

[22]  Kenneth A. Oye.  Cooperation under Anarchy , 1986 .

[23]  Wesley D. Chapin.  The Balance of Power Game , 1998 .

[24]  Charles F. Petranek.  Written Debriefing: The Next Vital Step in Learning with Simulations , 2000 .