Evolutionary form-finding of tensegrity structures

Tensegrity structures are stable 3-dimensional mechanical structures which maintain their form due to an intricate balance of forces between disjoint rigid elements and continuous tensile elements. Tensegrity structures can give rise to lightweight structures with high strength-to-weight ratios and their utility has been appreciated in architecture, engineering and recently robotics. However, the determination of connectivity patterns of the rigid and tensile elements which lead to stable tensegrity is challenging. Available methods are limited to the use of heuristic guidelines, hierarchical design based on known components, or mathematical methods which can explore only a subset of the space. This paper investigates the use of evolutionary algorithms in the form-finding of tensegrity structures. It is shown that an evolutionary algorithm can be used to explore the space of arbitrary tensegrity structures which are difficult to design using other methods, and determine new, non-regular forms. It suggests that evolutionary algorithms can be used as the basis for a general design methodology for tensegrity structures.

[1]  H. Schek The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks , 1974 .

[2]  H. Kenner Geodesic Math and How to Use It , 1976 .

[3]  Anthony Pugh,et al.  An Introduction to Tensegrity , 1976 .

[4]  Sergio Pellegrino,et al.  Mechanics of kinematically indeterminate structures , 1986 .

[5]  M Sun,et al.  A direct approach. , 1987, Science.

[6]  Hiroshi Furuya,et al.  Concept of Deployable Tensegrity Structures in Space Application , 1992 .

[7]  René Motro,et al.  Tensegrity Systems: The State of the Art , 1992 .

[8]  A. Hanaor Aspects of Design of Double-Layer Tensegrity Domes , 1992 .

[9]  Reg Connelly,et al.  Globally rigid Symmetric Tensegrities , 1995 .

[10]  J. Gabriel Beyond the cube : the architecture of space frames and polyhedra , 1997 .

[11]  Mark de Berg,et al.  Computational geometry: algorithms and applications , 1997 .

[12]  R. Connelly,et al.  Mathematics and Tensegrity , 1998, American Scientist.

[13]  Sariel Har-Peled,et al.  Efficiently approximating the minimum-volume bounding box of a point set in three dimensions , 1999, SODA '99.

[14]  René Motro,et al.  Multiparametered Formfinding Method: Application to Tensegrity Systems , 1999 .

[15]  Klaus Linkwitz Formfinding by the “Direct Approach” and Pertinent Strategies for the Conceptual Design of Prestressed and Hanging Structures , 1999 .

[16]  Gunnar Tibert,et al.  Deployable Tensegrity Structures for Space Applications , 2002 .

[17]  J.B. Aldrich,et al.  Control synthesis for a class of light and agile robotic tensegrity structures , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..

[18]  A. Tibert,et al.  Review of Form-Finding Methods for Tensegrity Structures , 2003 .

[19]  Joseph O'Rourke,et al.  Finding minimal enclosing boxes , 1985, International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences.

[20]  H. Lipson,et al.  Gait production in a tensegrity based robot , 2005, ICAR '05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2005..

[21]  Hod Lipson,et al.  A Relaxation Method for Simulating the Kinematics of Compound Nonlinear , 2006 .