Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour of Sandwiched Metal Panel of Aluminium and Mild Steel under Constant Amplitude Loading

*Corresponding author: m.faizal@upnm.edu.my 81 2020 UTHM Publisher. All rights reserved. penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/ijie Abstract: This study concerned about the sandwiched metal panel on the fatigue crack growth of mild steel and aluminium. The fatigue crack growth consists of 3 layer of metal sheet or panel that bonded together using adhesive of epoxy resin by hand lay-up technique. The 3 layers are consisting of 2 face metal sheets and 1 metal sheet as a core for the sandwiched; sandwiched of aluminium with mild steel panel (SAMSP) and sandwiched of mild steel panel (SMSP). The specimen was cut using Electrical Discharge Machine Wire Cut (EDM-wire cut) to get tensile test specimen based on American Standard Testing Method (ASTM) E8 before tested with speed rate of 3mm/min using Universal Testing Machine Instron 5569A (UTM). The stress strain curve was plotted in order to analyse the yield strength, Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) and the Young’s Modulus of the sandwiched. UTS value is used for the fatigue test in the maximum stress applied between 0.50%, 0.60%, 0.70%, 0.80% and 0.90% of UTS. The fatigue test was conducted under ASTM E647 compact tension C(T) standard using Instron 8801 Fatigue Machine with constant frequency of 20Hz and subjected to 1 million cyclic loading to reach failure. The crack growth behaviour of the specimen were discover that indicate the fatigue life, (a-N), fatigue crack growth and failure of the structure by the initial notch. The sandwiched of mild steel panel (SMSP) is compared with the sandwiched of aluminium with mild steel panel (SAMSP) to observe the crack growth behaviour and mechanical properties of the specimen in this study. It can be determined that SAMSP has two times better crack growth behaviour that improve the structure properties compare to the SMSP.

[1]  Pan Zhang,et al.  Numerical investigation on the dynamic response of foam-filled corrugated core sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading , 2019 .

[2]  I. Joohari,et al.  Geometry Strength of Honeycomb Sandwich Panel , 2018, International Journal of Integrated Engineering.

[3]  M. Z. Omar,et al.  Entropy-Based Approach for Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of Dual-Phase Steel , 2018, International Journal of Integrated Engineering.

[4]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Impact responses of sandwich panels with fibre metal laminate skins and aluminium foam core , 2017 .

[5]  K. Chandran,et al.  A universal functional for the physical description of fatigue crack growth in high-cycle and low-cycle fatigue conditions and in various specimen geometries , 2017 .

[6]  Zhihua Wang,et al.  The dynamic response of sandwich panels with cellular metal cores to localized impulsive loading , 2016 .

[7]  Tie-jun Wang,et al.  Experimental investigation of the fatigue of closed-cell aluminum alloy foam , 2015 .

[8]  Majid R. Ayatollahi,et al.  Mixed mode fatigue crack initiation and growth in a CT specimen repaired by stop hole technique , 2015 .

[9]  Zahit Mecitoğlu,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic behavior of viscoelastic sandwich composite plates under non-uniform blast load: Theory and experiment , 2014 .

[10]  カピツア、ハインリツヒ,et al.  Epoxy resin mixtures for prepregs and composites , 1995 .

[11]  Noridah Mohamad,et al.  Structural Behaviour of Precast Lightweight Foamed Concrete Sandwich Panel under Axial Load: An Overview , 2012 .

[12]  T. Xu,et al.  Fatigue of ship structural details : Technical development and problems , 1997 .

[13]  Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials 1 , 2022 .