Robustness of image pyramids under structural perturbations

Abstract Image pyramids have been used by many investigators as computational structures for multiresolution image processing and analysis. We have subjected such pyramids to various structural perturbations and investigated their effects on the functions of the pyramid. The perturbations ranged from adding Gaussian noise to the weights of the generating kernel, to generating a hierarchy of completely irregular tessellations of the image field. We have shown that homogeneous parts of the low resolution representations of the input image may be recovered by renormalizing the corrupted weights. Multiresolution algorithms transposed to irregular (stochastic) structures exhibited only a small decrease in performance. We conclude that pyramidal algorithms are robust and are only weakly dependent on the underlying structure. We propose that some of these pyramidal algorithms may also serve as computational models for perceptual phenomena.

[1]  P. J. Burt,et al.  Fast Filter Transforms for Image Processing , 1981 .

[2]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Recognizing Unexpected Objects: a Proposed Approach , 1987, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[3]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Frequency Domain Analysis and Synthesis of Image Pyramid Generating Kernels , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  K. Ruddock The organization of human vision for pattern detection and recognition , 1977 .

[5]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  Neocognitron: A neural network model for a mechanism of visual pattern recognition , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6]  Shmuel Peleg,et al.  Custom-made pyramids , 1987 .

[7]  P. Burt Tree and pyramid structures for coding hexagonally sampled binary images , 1980 .

[8]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Detection and delineation of compact objects using intensity pyramids , 1988, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  P. Burt Fast filter transform for image processing , 1981 .

[10]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Invariant features of contrast detection: an explanation in terms of self-similar detector arrays. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  A B Watson,et al.  Efficiency of a model human image code. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  Peter Meer,et al.  Stochastic image pyramids , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[13]  Hans Marko,et al.  A Biological Approach to Pattern Recognition , 1974, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  Peter Meer,et al.  A fast parallel method for synthesis of random patterns , 1989, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Yoshiro Fukada,et al.  Gain control mechanisms in X- and Y-type retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1986, Vision Research.

[16]  Jean-Pierre Crettez,et al.  A model for cell receptive fields in the visual striate cortex , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[17]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  O(log n) bimodality analysis , 1989, Pattern Recognit..