Numerical study on a canonized Hamiltonian system representing reduced magnetohydrodynamics and its comparison with two-dimensional Euler system

Introducing a Clebsch-like parameterization, we have formulated a canonical Hamiltonian system on a symplectic leaf of reduced magnetohydrodynamics. An interesting structure of the equations is in that the Lorentz-force, which is a quadratic nonlinear term in the conventional formulation, appears as a linear term −ΔQ, just representing the current density (Q is a Clebsch variable, and Δ is the two-dimensional Laplacian); omitting this term reduces the system into the two-dimensional Euler vorticity equation of a neutral fluid. A heuristic estimate shows that current sheets grow exponentially (even in a fully nonlinear regime) together with the action variable P that is conjugate to Q. By numerical simulation, the predicted behavior of the canonical variables, yielding exponential growth of current sheets, has been demonstrated.

[1]  Z. Yoshida,et al.  Canonical Hamiltonian mechanics of Hall magnetohydrodynamics and its limit to ideal magnetohydrodynamics , 2013 .

[2]  Z. Yoshida,et al.  Canonical Hamiltonian Model of Reduced MHD and its Comparison with the Two-Dimensional Euler System , 2013 .

[3]  Y. Kishimoto,et al.  Structure-driven nonlinear instability as the origin of the explosive reconnection dynamics in resistive double tearing modes. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[4]  Y. Kishimoto,et al.  Critical parameters for the nonlinear destabilization of double tearing modes in reversed shear plasmas , 2011 .

[5]  Z. Yoshida Clebsch parameterization: Basic properties and remarks on its applications , 2009 .

[6]  Christiane Marliani,et al.  Evolution of current sheets and regularity of ideal incompressible magnetic fluids in 2D , 2000 .

[7]  R. Grauer,et al.  Geometry of singular structures in magnetohydrodynamic flows , 1998 .

[8]  P. Morrison,et al.  Hamiltonian description of the ideal fluid , 1998 .

[9]  Francesco Pegoraro,et al.  Generalized two-fluid theory of nonlinear magnetic structures , 1994 .

[10]  F. Pegoraro,et al.  Hamiltonian formulation of low-frequency, nonlinear plasma dynamics , 1994 .

[11]  Ottaviani,et al.  Nonlinear collisionless magnetic reconnection. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[12]  Richard D Hazeltine,et al.  Hamiltonian formulation of reduced magnetohydrodynamics , 1983 .

[13]  P. Morrison,et al.  Noncanonical Hamiltonian Density Formulation of Hydrodynamics and Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics. , 1980 .

[14]  H. R. Strauss,et al.  Dynamics of high tokamaks , 1977 .

[15]  H. R. Strauss,et al.  Numerical studies of nonlinear evolution of kink modes in tokamaks , 1976 .

[16]  S. Mahajan,et al.  Duality of the Lagrangian and Eulerian representations of collective motion—a connection built around vorticity , 2011 .

[17]  Y. Fukumoto A Unified View of Topological Invariants of Fluid Flows , 2008 .

[18]  H. R. Strauss,et al.  Nonlinear, three‐dimensional magnetohydrodynamics of noncircular tokamaks , 1976 .

[19]  A. Clebsch,et al.  Ueber die Integration der hydrodynamischen Gleichungen. , 1859 .