A comparison of upper vs. lower and right vs. left visual fields using lexical decision

A series of experiments using the lexical decision task was conducted in order to investigate the functional differences between the upper and lower visual fields (UVF, LoVF) in word recognition. Word-nonword discrimination was swifter and more accurate for word stimuli presented in the UVF. Changing the eccentricity did not affect the UVF advantage over the LoVF. UVF superiority over LoVF was found to be equivalent for both right and left visual hemifield (RVF, LVF). In general, presenting related word primes enhanced all visual field differences in a similar manner (UVF over LoVF and RVF over LVF). However, primes consisting of semantically constraining sentences enhanced the RVF advantage over the LVF, but did not affect the UVF and LoVF differentially. The argument is made that UVF superiority cannot be due to perceptual or attentional differences alone, but must also reflect top-down information flow.

[1]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[2]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  A. Durgunoğlu,et al.  Repetition, semantic priming, and stimulus quality: implications for the interactive-compensatory reading model. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  P. Coles,et al.  Visual field differences in recognizing letters , 1976 .

[5]  H. Babkoff,et al.  Script as a Priming Stimulus for Lexical Decisions with Visual Hemifield Stimulation , 1997, Brain and Language.

[6]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Lateralization of Lexical Processes in the Normal Brain: A Review of Visual Half-field Research , 1988 .

[7]  Z. Eviatar Reading Direction and Attention - Effects on Lateralized Ignoring , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  Julie R. Brannan,et al.  The benefits and constraints of visual processing dichotomies , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  A. Nowicka,et al.  Visual-spatial-frequency model of cerebral asymmetry: a critical survey of behavioral and electrophysiological studies. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  J. Horton,et al.  The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  A. Lambert,et al.  Selective Attention, Visual Laterality, Awareness, and Perceiving the Meaning of Parafoveally Presented Words , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[13]  G. Vining,et al.  Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .

[14]  Asymmetries in Perception of Tachistoscopically Presented Horizontal and Vertical Random-Letter Strings , 1983, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  W. Bevan,et al.  The distribution of scotopic sensitivity in human vision. , 1953, The American journal of psychology.

[17]  K. Heilman,et al.  Visual Field Influence on Radial Line Bisection , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[18]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  The role of spatial attention in visual word processing. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  J. Sergent The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  S. Kravetz,et al.  Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: implications for modularity vs interactionism. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[21]  C. Burgess,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.

[22]  S. Heywood,et al.  Structure of the Visual Array and Saccadic Latency: Implications for Oculomotor Control* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Charles J. Campbell,et al.  The Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer. , 1965 .

[24]  S. Christman Local-global processing in the upper versus lower visual fields , 1993 .

[25]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Semantic priming with abstract and concrete words: Differential asymmetry may be postlexical , 1987, Brain and Language.

[26]  G. Lennerstrand,et al.  CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL NORMAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FOR STATIC AND DYNAMIC SINUSOIDAL GRATINGS , 1983, Acta ophthalmologica.

[27]  B. Julesz,et al.  Binocular-Disparity-Dependent Upper—Lower Hemifield Anisotropy and Left—Right Hemifield Isotropy as Revealed by Dynamic Random-Dot Stereograms , 1976, Perception.

[28]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[29]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .

[30]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Activation of lexical codes for simultaneously presented words: modulation by attention and pathway strength. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[32]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Enhanced Perception of Illusory Contours in the Lower Versus Upper Visual Hemifields , 1996, Science.

[33]  E. Yund,et al.  Serial processing of visual spatial patterns in a search paradigm , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  Donald J. Lyle,et al.  The Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer , 1964 .

[35]  F. Previc Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  Robert E. Haussmann Tachistoscopic presentation and millisecond timing on the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2: A Turbo Pascal unit to provide general-purpose routines for CGA, Hercules, EGA, and VGA monitors , 1992 .

[37]  C. Chiarello Hemisphere dynamics in lexical access: Automatic and controlled priming , 1985, Brain and Language.

[38]  M. Faust,et al.  Levels of Sentence Constraint and Lexical Decision in the Two Hemispheres , 1998, Brain and Language.

[39]  G. Underwood,et al.  Twisting the world by 90° , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  S G Lisberger,et al.  Visual motion processing for the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements in humans. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  W. H. Payne Visual Reaction Times on a Circle about the Fovea , 1967, Science.

[42]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Depth of associated activation in the cerebral hemispheres: Mediated versus direct priming , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  H. Babkoff,et al.  Lexical Decision, Parafoveal Eccentricity and Visual Hemifield , 1985, Cortex.

[45]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: With emphasis on the low spatial frequency range , 1989, Vision Research.

[46]  L L SLOAN,et al.  Rate of dark adaptation and regional threshold gradient of the dark-adapted eye; physiologic and clinical studies. , 1947, American journal of ophthalmology.

[47]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Letter identification declines with increasing retinal eccentricity at the same rate for normal and dyslexic readers , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[49]  Miriam Faust,et al.  Lexical decision and visual hemifield: An examination of the RT—Accuracy relationship , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  J. Hellige,et al.  Perceptual reference frames and visual field asymmetry for verbal processing , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[52]  K. Kirsner,et al.  Laterality Effects in Visual Information Processing: Hemispheric Specialisation or the Orienting of Attention?* , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[53]  H. Babkoff,et al.  Lexical Decision Time as a Function of Visual Field and Stimulus Probability , 1983, Cortex.

[54]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Central Fixations are Inadequately Controlled by Instructions Alone: Implications for Studying Cerebral Asymmetry , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[56]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  S. Ceci,et al.  Semantic priming effects for stimuli presented to the right and left visual fields , 1985, Brain and Language.

[58]  C. Burgess,et al.  Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't … sometimes, some places , 1990, Brain and Language.

[59]  G. J. van der Wildt,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[60]  Stephen Christman,et al.  Perceptual characteristics in visual laterality research , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[61]  S. Christman,et al.  Upper and lower visual field differences in categorical and coordinate judgments , 1998 .

[62]  M. Eglin,et al.  Interference and priming within and across visual fields in a lexical decision task , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  W. Skrandies The Upper and Lower Visual Field of Man: Electrophysiological and Functional Differences , 1987 .