Exporting e-Customs to Developing Countries: A Semiotic Perspective

This paper reports on an ongoing study of an initiative to build e-Customs capabilities in eastern Africa. The EU’s customs capability building unit is trying to “export” e-Customs solutions to developing countries in order to strengthen the competiveness of companies based in these countries. Following the international development, eCustoms (with the improved control and traceability possibilities from producer to end consumer) will soon be a prerequisite for participation in international trade. The study is based on a semiotic framework for e-Customs implementations. Previous research has shown how interdependencies between the syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic levels cause problems already within the EU. This research we are now expanding to the introduction of so called Authorized Economic Operators (AEOs) in the East African Community. Since this project has just recently started we have only limited empirical material to load our framework, but initial data shows that the African initiative is trying to implement only parts of the e-Customs solutions that are developed to fit into a different semiotic structure. We can conclude that significant challenges lay ahead in adjusting also the rest of the structure if the initiative is to be successful.

[1]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  The IS Core - VII: Towards Information Systems as a Science of Meta-Artifacts , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Steven L. Alter The IS Core - XI: Sorting Out the Issues About the Core, Scope, and Identity of the IS Field , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[4]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  eCustoms Innovation and Transformation: A Research Approach , 2006, Bled eConference.

[5]  John Krogstie,et al.  Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[7]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  A semiotics framework for information systems classification and development , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Paul Beynon-Davies Information Systems: An Introduction To Informatics In Organisations , 2003 .

[9]  L. Razmerita,et al.  Recognising Professional-Activity Groups and Web Usage Mining for Web Browsing Personalisation , 2007, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07).

[10]  Paul A. Swatman,et al.  Structured-case: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research , 2000, ECIS.

[11]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  Understanding the influence of multiple levels of governments on the development of inter-organizational systems , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  J. Whitney Case Study Research , 1999 .

[13]  Tineke M. Egyedi,et al.  Difficulties implementing standards , 2003, ESSDERC 2003. Proceedings of the 33rd European Solid-State Device Research - ESSDERC '03 (IEEE Cat. No. 03EX704).

[14]  Jianwei Liu,et al.  Rethinking EU Trade Procedures - The Beer Living Lab , 2007, Bled eConference.

[15]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Actability: a Way to Understand Information Systems Pragmatics , 2002 .