Modeling the interaction of phonemic intelligibility and lexical structure in audiovisual word recognition
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. Landauer,et al. Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .
[2] David Carter,et al. Lexical stress and lexical discriminability: Stressed syllables are more informative, but why? , 1989 .
[3] P. Kricos. Differences in Visual Intelligibility Across Talkers , 1996 .
[4] M. Woodward,et al. Phoneme perception in lipreading. , 1960, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[5] W. H. Sumby,et al. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .
[6] Lynne E. Bernstein,et al. Lipreading supplemented by voice fundamental frequency: to what extent does the addition of voicing increase lexical uniqueness for the lipreader , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.
[7] B. Walden,et al. Effects of training on the visual recognition of consonants. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[8] L. Bernstein,et al. Single-channel vibrotactile supplements to visual perception of intonation and stress. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] G. Altmann. Cognitive models of speech processing , 1991 .
[10] L. Braida. Crossmodal Integration in the Identification of Consonant Segments , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[11] H. Savin. Word‐Frequency Effect and Errors in the Perception of Speech , 1963 .
[12] P. Luce. Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon , 1986 .
[13] M. Aldenderfer. Cluster Analysis , 1984 .
[14] M E Demorest,et al. Lipreading sentences with vibrotactile vocoders: performance of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] E. Owens,et al. Visemes observed by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adult viewers. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[16] A. M. Aull,et al. Lexical stress determination and its application to large vocabulary speech recognition , 1985, ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[17] H. Kucera,et al. Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .
[18] D. Reisberg,et al. Easy to hear but hard to understand: A lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. , 1987 .
[19] D. Massaro. Speech Perception By Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry , 1989 .
[20] Lynne E. Bernstein,et al. Elucidating the complex relationships between phonetic perception and word recognition in audiovisual speech perception , 1997, AVSP.
[21] R. Campbell,et al. Hearing by eye : the psychology of lip-reading , 1988 .
[22] Victor Zue,et al. A model of lexical access from partial phonetic information , 1984, ICASSP.
[23] Ken W. Grant,et al. Evaluating the articulation index for auditory–visual consonant recognition , 1993 .
[24] David B. Pisoni,et al. Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon , 1985, Speech Commun..
[25] S. Lesner. Differences in visual intelligibility across talkers , 1982 .
[26] D. Norris. Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.
[27] P K Kuhl,et al. The role of visual information in the processing of , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[28] C. G. Fisher,et al. Confusions among visually perceived consonants. , 1968, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[29] Lynne E. Bernstein,et al. A comparison of perceptual word similarity metrics , 1997 .
[30] James L. McClelland,et al. The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[31] A. Maynard Engebertson,et al. Implementation of a Microprocessor-Based Tactile Hearing Prosthesis , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[32] David B. Pisoni,et al. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words , 1991 .
[33] W. Marslen-Wilson,et al. The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon , 1991, Cognition.
[34] A M Liberman,et al. Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.
[35] L. Bernstein,et al. Speechreading and the structure of the lexicon: computationally modeling the effects of reduced phonetic distinctiveness on lexical uniqueness. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] David Carter,et al. An information-theoretic analysis of phonetic dictionary access , 1987 .
[37] M. J. Norušis,et al. SPSS professional statistics 6.1 , 1994 .
[38] Y. Tohkura,et al. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.