Dynamic Representation and Interpretation in a Multiagent 3D Tutoring System

In this paper we present an intelligent tutoring system which aims at decreasing students’ dropout rate by offering the possibility of a personalized follow-up. We address the specific problem of the evolution of the large amount of data to be processed and interpreted in an intelligent tutoring system. In this regard we detail the architecture and experimental results of our decision support system used as the core of the intelligent tutor—which could be applied to a variety of teaching fields. The first part presents an overview of the characteristics of intelligent tutors, the chosen data organization—composed of a composite factual semantic feature descriptive representation associated to a multiagent system—and two examples used to illustrate the architecture of our prototype. The second and last part describes all the components of the prototype: student interface, dynamic representation layer, characterization, and interpretation layers. First, for the student interface, the system shows our 3D virtual campus named GE3D to be connected to the intelligent tutor. Then we explain how the agents of the first layer represent the evolution of the situation being analyzed. Next, we specify the use of the characterization layer to cluster the agents of representation layer and to compute compound parameters. Finally, we expose how—using compound parameters—the third layer can measure similarity between current target case and past cases to constitute an interpretation of cases according to a case-based reasoning paradigm.

[1]  Thierry Galinho,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring System in GE3D Virtual Campus , 2012 .

[2]  Thierry Galinho,et al.  Intelligent tutor design for a 3D virtual campus , 2012, 2012 6th IEEE International Conference Intelligent Systems.

[3]  George Luger,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving (5th Edition) , 2004 .

[4]  Hyacinth S. Nwana,et al.  Intelligent tutoring systems: an overview , 1990, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[5]  Michael Wolf,et al.  An Intelligent Artificial Player for the Game of Risk , 2005 .

[6]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-learning , 2008 .

[7]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[8]  Thierry Galinho,et al.  GE3D: A Virtual Campus for Technology-Enhanced Distance Learning , 2010, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[9]  Cyrille Bertelle,et al.  MultiAgent case-based reasoning and individualized follow-up of learner in remote learning , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems.

[10]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming, Volume I: Fundamental Algorithms, 2nd Edition , 1997 .

[11]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE STUDENTS’ DECISION TO DROPOUT OF ONLINE COURSES , 2019, Online Learning.

[12]  Abdelhamid Zouhair Raisonnement à partir de cas dynamique multi-agents - Application à un système de tuteur intelligent , 2014 .

[13]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[14]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  COMPUTER SCIENCE: THE DISCIPLINE , 1999 .

[15]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  An introduction to case-based reasoning , 1992, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[16]  Fabio Bellifemine,et al.  Developing Multi-Agent Systems with JADE (Wiley Series in Agent Technology) , 2007 .