What has 25 years of P/OM research taught us about productivity

Achieving productivity growth that is both sustained and sustainable is clearly a concern of Governments across the world, yet what has 25-years of research in production and operations management taught us about productivity and to what extent have these lessons been incorporated into mainstream public policy debates. Using data gathered during a meta-analysis of papers published during the last 25 years in the International Journal of Operations and Production Management (IJOPM), the Journal of Operations Management (JOM) and the International Journal of Production Economics (IJPE) this paper argues that the P/OM community has largely failed to engage with the policy community, not because the research undertaken by the P/OM community is irrelevant to the policy community, but because the P/OM community has failed to capitalize on its relevance. Using a framework based on the OMA model – opportunity, motivation and ability - we explore the reasons why this is the case for individual P/OM scholars and the community as a whole.

[1]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  The Lisbon Strategy and the EU's structural productivity problem , 2005 .

[2]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities , 2004 .

[3]  M. Porter,et al.  UK Competitiveness: moving to the next stage , 2003 .

[4]  Raphael Kaplinsky,et al.  Putting supply chain learning into practice , 2003 .

[5]  Mary O’Mahony,et al.  Britain's Relative Productivity Performance: Has Anything Changed? , 2002, National Institute Economic Review.

[6]  R. Hayes.  TOWARD A “NEW ARCHITECTURE” FOR POM , 2000 .

[7]  Sameer Prasad,et al.  International operations management research , 2000 .

[8]  Roberto Filippini,et al.  Operations management research: some reflections on evolution, models and empirical studies in OM , 1997 .

[9]  Nick Oliver,et al.  The European auto components industry: Manufacturing performance and practice , 1996 .

[10]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Enhancing and Measuring Consumers’ Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from Ads , 1991 .

[11]  A. Meyer,et al.  Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory , 1990 .

[12]  J. Meredith,et al.  Alternative research paradigms in operations , 1989 .

[13]  R. Batra,et al.  Situational Effects of Advertising Repetition: The Moderating Influence of Motivation, Ability, and Opportunity to Respond , 1986 .

[14]  Roger W. Schmenner,et al.  PRODUCTION/OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT: AGENDA FOR THE '80s* , 1981 .

[15]  E. S. Buffa.  Research in Operations Management , 1980 .

[16]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[17]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Managing our way to economic decline , 2007 .

[18]  Andy Neely,et al.  Production/Operations Management: Research Process and Content during the 1980s , 1993 .

[19]  K. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization , 1988 .

[20]  J. C. Andrews.  Motivation, Ability, and Opportunity to Process Information: Conceptual and Experimental Manipulation Issues , 1988 .

[21]  Ca Voss,et al.  Production/operations management—A key discipline and area for research , 1984 .

[22]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing , 1984 .

[23]  William W. Cooper,et al.  SHORT COMMUNICATION: MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION MAKING UNITS , 1979 .