Assessing the Human, Social, and Environmental Risks of Pervasive Computing

ABSTRACT The vision of Pervasive Computing is built on the assumption that computers will become part of everyday objects, augmenting them with information services and enhanced functionality. This article reports on the approach we have used to assess potential side effects of this development on human health and the environment, and the major risks we identified. Social risks such as the risk of conflicts between users and non-users of the technology were also included because of their potential indirect adverse health effects. Assessing a technological vision before it has materialized makes it necessary to deal with two types of uncertainty: first, the uncertainty of how fast and to what extent the technology will be taken up and how it will be used; second, the uncertainty of causal models connecting technology-related causes with potential health or environmental effects. Due to these uncertainties, quantitative methods to evaluate expected risks are inadequate. Instead, we developed a “risk filter” that makes it possible to rank risks according to a set of qualitative criteria based on the Precautionary Principle. As the overall result, it turned out that Pervasive Computing bears potential risks to health, society, and/or the environment in the following fields: Non-ionizing radiation, stress imposed on the user, restriction of consumers' and patients' freedom of choice, threats to ecological sustainability, and dissipation of responsibility in computer-controlled environments.

[1]  Chen Son,et al.  Sustainable Development and Innovation , 2003 .

[2]  P. Achermann,et al.  Exposure to pulsed high‐frequency electromagnetic field during waking affects human sleep EEG , 2000, Neuroreport.

[3]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies 1 , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Kenny S. Crump Quantitative Risk Assessment Since the Red Book: Where Have We Come and Where Should We Be Going? , 2003 .

[5]  Ulrich Müller-Herold Quantitative Vorsorgebewertung neuer Chemikalien im Hinblick auf globale Gefährdungsszenarios , 2002 .

[6]  E. Petersen,et al.  Auswirkungen des Pervasive Computing auf Gesundheit und Umwelt , 2003 .

[7]  Mark Weiser,et al.  The world is not a desktop , 1994, INTR.

[8]  Lorenz Erdmann,et al.  Expected Environmental Impacts of Pervasive Computing , 2004 .

[9]  Peter Ayton,et al.  Arguments for Qualitative Risk Assessment: The StAR Risk Adviser , 1997 .

[10]  Christian Rammel,et al.  Sustainable development and innovations: lessons from the Red Queen , 2003 .

[11]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  The future impact of ICT on environmental sustainability , 2004 .

[12]  Siegfried Behrendt,et al.  Electromagnetic Field Exposure from Pervasive Computing , 2004 .

[13]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  The Precautionary Principle in the Information Society , 2004 .

[14]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[15]  Judith L. Anderson,et al.  Decision Analysis: A Method for Taking Uncertainties into Account in Risk-Based Decision Making , 1999 .

[16]  Adam M. Finkel,et al.  The Joy Before Cooking: Preparing Ourselves to Write a Risk Research Recipe , 2002 .

[17]  F. Owen Hoffman,et al.  Uncertainty Is Part of Making Decisions , 1999 .

[18]  J. Farman,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000 , 2002 .