An Evaluation Method for Emergency Procedures in Automatic Metro Based on Complexity

Complexity of emergency procedures have direct impacts on the accomplishment of tasks in metro system. In order to ensure the efficient operation of automated metro in emergency scenarios, it is necessary to understand the potential relationship between system change and emergency procedures. To solve this problem, an evaluation method for emergency procedures is proposed. Firstly, on the basis of investigation, interview and empirical analysis of different types of automated metro lines, combined with Team-Cognitive Work Analysis(CWA) method and network theory, the team emergency task network is established. Then four characteristic indexes, i.e. degree, average shortest path length, agglomeration coefficient and overall network efficiency, are selected as the analysis metrics of emergency task network complexity. The complexity of different emergency procedures under grades of automation(GOA) 4 and same emergency procedure under GOA1-GOA4 are comprehensively analyzed. The research results reveal that no matter what level of automation system, the more nodes and communication between nodes, the larger network scale is, which will lead to the emergency procedures more complicated, and vice versa. The driver’s behavior plays a decisive role in the variation of communicating frequencies.

[1]  Tao Tang,et al.  System dynamics approach for modelling the variation of organizational factors for risk control in automatic metro , 2017 .

[2]  Jinkyun Park,et al.  Relation between task complexity and variability of procedure progression during an emergency operation , 2013 .

[3]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  Using team cognitive work analysis to reveal healthcare team interactions in a birthing unit , 2014, Ergonomics.

[4]  Ke Niu,et al.  A team task complexity measure for emergency procedures in fully automatic metro , 2019, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[5]  Ramon Malla,et al.  Fully Automatic Metro Operation - A Possibility for Today, a Must for Tomorrow , 2007 .

[6]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[7]  Sybert H. Stroeve,et al.  Accident Risk Analysis Benchmarking Monte Carlo Simulation versus Event Sequences , 2008 .

[8]  Tao Tang,et al.  Applying Hybrid Decision-Making Method Based on Fuzzy AHP-WOWA Operator for Emergency Alternative Evaluation of Unattended Train Operation Metro System , 2016 .

[9]  Xuebo Zhang,et al.  Multilevel Humanlike Motion Planning for Mobile Robots in Complex Indoor Environments , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[10]  Paula Savioja,et al.  Hidden roles of the train driver: A challenge for metro automation , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[11]  Kathleen M. Dale,et al.  The Impact of Group Cognitive Complexity on Group Satisfaction: A Person-Environment Fit Perspective , 2010 .

[12]  J Williams,et al.  Balancing automation and human action through task analysis , 1992 .

[13]  Xuebo Zhang,et al.  Acceleration-Level Pseudo-Dynamic Visual Servoing of Mobile Robots With Backstepping and Dynamic Surface Control , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[14]  Ke Niu,et al.  Team Task Complexity of Traffic Dispatchers in Operating Control Center:A Network-based Concept , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT).

[15]  R.G. Orendi,et al.  Human-factors considerations in emergency procedure implementation , 1988, Conference Record for 1988 IEEE Fourth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants,.

[16]  Wondea Jung,et al.  A study on the development of a task complexity measure for emergency operating procedures of nuclear power plants , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  Contrasting safety assessments of a runway incursion scenario: Event sequence analysis versus multi-agent dynamic risk modelling , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Comparing Organizational Routines as Recurrent Patterns of Action , 2010 .

[20]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  Reliability analysis and redundancy design of smart grid wireless communications system for demand side management , 2012, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[21]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  The Effects of Information Technology Project Complexity on Group Interaction , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[23]  Jun Tian,et al.  Emergency Tasks Planning Based on Formal Modeling of Emergency Plan and HTN Planning System SHOP2 , 2012 .