A balance theory approach to group problem solving

Abstract This paper presents a conceptualization of group problem solving based on Heider's balance theory [Cartwright, D., Harary, F., 1956. Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review 63, 277–292; Heider, F., 1946. Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology 21, 107–112; Heider, F., 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley, New York], in which the problem solving process is viewed as a struggle toward increasing structural balance. Balance theory provides a means of representing problems that captures both gestalt restructuring and incremental search aspects of the problem solving process. An experimental method based on a flexible card categorization task operationalizes this conceptual view in a group problem solving situation. Results of an experiment investigating the effects of certain properties of problem structure on group problem solving behavior and performance are reported.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  F. Harary.  On the measurement of structural balance , 2007 .

[3]  S. Ohlsson,et al.  Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving , 1999 .

[4]  Gbemisola Abimbola,et al.  EFFECTS OF TASK STRUCTURE ON GROUP PROBLEM SOLVING , 2006 .

[5]  P. Doreian,et al.  A partitioning approach to structural balance , 1996 .

[6]  K. Dunbar.  How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. , 1997 .

[7]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[8]  M. E. Shaw.  A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. , 1932 .

[9]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[10]  James A. Davis.  Clustering and Structural Balance in Graphs , 1977 .

[11]  Bryan L. Bonner,et al.  The Effects of Extroversion on Influence in Ambiguous Group Tasks , 2000 .

[12]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[13]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[14]  C. Osgood,et al.  The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. , 1955, Psychological review.

[15]  E. Chrysikou.  When shoes become hammers: Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem-solving performance. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  K. Lewin,et al.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers , 1951 .

[17]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[19]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[20]  T C Ormerod,et al.  Information processing and insight: a process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problems. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Craig A. Kaplan,et al.  In search of insight , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  W. Richard Kite,et al.  Experiments on the alteration of group structure , 1965 .

[23]  H. Leavitt.  Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[24]  M. Scheerer,et al.  Problem Solving , 1967, Nature.

[25]  W. Köhler.  The Mentality of Apes. , 2018, Nature.

[26]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  What is Organizational Knowledge , 2001 .

[28]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups Perform Better than the Best Individuals on Letters-to-numbers Problems: Effects of Group Size Two-letter Substitution Strategy , 2003 .

[29]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Coherence as Constraint Satisfaction , 2019, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[32]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Groups as problem‐solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition , 1993 .

[33]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[34]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[35]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Minding the Law , 2000 .

[36]  Reeshad S. Dalal,et al.  The effects of member expertise on group decision-making and performance , 2002 .

[37]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[38]  William W. S. Wei,et al.  Time series analysis - univariate and multivariate methods , 1989 .

[39]  James N MacGregor,et al.  What makes an insight problem? The roles of heuristics, goal conception, and solution recoding in knowledge-lean problems. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  P. Thagard,et al.  Explanatory coherence , 1993 .

[41]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Structural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction , 2002 .

[42]  S. Ian Robertson,et al.  Problem-solving , 2001, Human Thinking.

[43]  M. Wertheimer.  Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .

[44]  Hal W. Hendrick,et al.  Problem Solving in Different Sized Groups. , 1971 .

[45]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950-1990 , 1992 .

[46]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups , 1994 .

[47]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[48]  W. Bechtel,et al.  A companion to cognitive science , 1999 .

[49]  F. Heider.  Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.

[50]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[51]  Hal W. Hendrick,et al.  Differences in group problem-solving behavior and effectiveness as a function of abstractness. , 1979 .

[52]  W. Köhler.  The task of Gestalt psychology , 1969 .

[53]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[54]  Francis D. Tuggle,et al.  A complete dyadic process model of four man group problem-solving , 1971 .

[55]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[56]  R W Smith,et al.  Sudden insight: all-or-none processing revealed by speed-accuracy decomposition. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[58]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[59]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[60]  J. Davitz,et al.  A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  M. Wertheimer.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[62]  T. Shultz,et al.  Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. , 1996, Psychological review.

[63]  R. Kapuściński,et al.  A brief history of balance through time , 1996 .

[64]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[65]  The nature of insight , 1996 .

[66]  G. W. Hill.  Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[67]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[68]  T. Newcomb.  An approach to the study of communicative acts. , 1953, Psychological review.

[69]  Bryan L. Bonner,et al.  Expertise in Group Problem Solving: Recognition, Social Combination, and Performance. , 2004 .

[70]  Norman,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. , 1966 .

[71]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Some dynamics of social balance processes: bringing Heider back into balance theory , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[72]  J. H. Davis.  Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[73]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[74]  Stasser,et al.  A Primer of Social Decision Scheme Theory: Models of Group Influence, Competitive Model-Testing, and Prospective Modeling. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[75]  B. A. Farbey,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs , 1966 .

[76]  Thomas J. Fararo,et al.  Assessing hierarchy and balance in dynamic network models , 1995 .