Riskr: a web 2.0 platform to monitor and share disaster information

Disaster management that uses web-based technology to enhance user collaboration around disasters is an emergent field. A number of dedicated 'disaster portals' exist but they do not integrate large social networks such as Twitter and Facebook. These social networking sites can facilitate the analysis and sharing of collective intelligence around disaster information on a far greater scale by increasing accessibility to, and the use of, a disaster portal. This paper presents the 'Riskr' project, which applies a low-technological solution to creating a disaster portal fed by social networking messages. The system has been implemented using Twitter and tested by users to determine the feasibility. Results suggest the combination of online services and interoperability between disaster portals; and social networks can further enhance disaster management initiatives as 70.5% of the users were able to estimate the correct location of a disaster e.g. fallen power lines, fire.

[1]  Carlos A. Iglesias,et al.  Disasters2.0: application of web 2.0 technologies in emergency situations , 2009 .

[2]  Miles Efron,et al.  Hashtag retrieval in a microblogging environment , 2010, SIGIR.

[3]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Quality of Trilateration: Confidence-Based Iterative Localization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[4]  Bertrand De Longueville,et al.  "OMG, from here, I can see the flames!": a use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires , 2009, LBSN '09.

[5]  Ishak Abdul Azid,et al.  Trilateration target estimation improvement using new Error Correction Algorithm , 2010, 2010 18th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering.

[6]  JinKyu Lee,et al.  Web 2.0 Emergency Applications: How Useful Can Twitter be for Emergency Response? , 2009 .

[7]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Detecting Spammers on Twitter , 2010 .

[8]  Axel Bruns Towards distributed citizen participation: Lessons from WikiLeaks and the Queensland floods , 2011 .

[9]  John Yen,et al.  Classifying text messages for the haiti earthquake , 2011, ISCRAM.

[10]  Anand Karandikar,et al.  Clustering short status messages: A topic model based approach , 2010 .

[11]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[12]  Lisl Zach,et al.  Microblogging for crisis communication: Examination of twitter use in response to a 2009 violent crisis in the Seattle-Tacoma, Washington area , 2010, ISCRAM.

[13]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Information credibility on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[14]  Paloma Díaz,et al.  Interaction design for web emergency management information systems , 2010, ISCRAM.

[15]  Jeannette N. Sutton,et al.  Twittering Tennessee: Distributed networks and collaboration following a technological disaster , 2010, ISCRAM.

[16]  Yutaka Matsuo,et al.  Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors , 2010, WWW '10.

[17]  Amanda Lee Hughes,et al.  Collective Intelligence in Disaster: Examination of the Phenomenon in the Aftermath of the 2007 Virginia Tech Shooting , 2008 .

[18]  Junlan Feng,et al.  Robust Sentiment Detection on Twitter from Biased and Noisy Data , 2010, COLING.

[19]  Matthew A. Russell,et al.  21 Recipes for Mining Twitter , 2011 .

[20]  A. Bruns,et al.  The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics , 2011 .

[21]  Satyen Abrol,et al.  TWinner: understanding news queries with geo-content using Twitter , 2010, GIR.

[22]  Jeannie A. Stamberger,et al.  Tweak the tweet: Leveraging microblogging proliferation with a prescriptive syntax to support citizen reporting , 2010, ISCRAM.

[23]  Hanan Samet,et al.  TwitterStand: news in tweets , 2009, GIS.