Dynamics of robust pattern separability in the hippocampal dentate gyrus

The dentate gyrus (DG) is thought to perform pattern separation on inputs received from the entorhinal cortex, such that the DG forms distinct representations of different input patterns. Neuronal responses, however, are known to be variable, and that variability has the potential to confuse the representations of different inputs, thereby hindering the pattern separation function. This variability can be especially problematic for tissues such as the DG, in which the responses can persist for tens of seconds following stimulation: the long response duration allows for variability from many different sources to accumulate. To understand how the DG can robustly encode different input patterns, we investigated a recently developed in vitro hippocampal DG preparation that generates persistent responses to transient electrical stimulation. For 10–20 s after stimulation, the responses are indicative of the pattern of stimulation that was applied, even though the responses exhibit significant trial‐to‐trial variability. Analyzing the dynamical trajectories of the evoked responses, we found that, following stimulation, the neural responses follow distinct paths through the space of possible neural activations, with a different path associated with each stimulation pattern. The neural responses' trial‐to‐trial variability shifts the responses along these paths rather than between them, maintaining the separability of the input patterns. Manipulations that redistributed the variability more isotropically over the space of possible neural activations impeded the pattern separation function. Consequently, we conclude that the confinement of neuronal variability to these one‐dimensional paths mitigates the impacts of variability on pattern encoding and, thus, may be an important aspect of the DG's ability to robustly encode input patterns. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade‐off , 1994, Hippocampus.

[2]  R. Romo,et al.  Correlated Neuronal Discharges that Increase Coding Efficiency during Perceptual Discrimination , 2003, Neuron.

[3]  Yu Hu,et al.  The Sign Rule and Beyond: Boundary Effects, Flexibility, and Noise Correlations in Neural Population Codes , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  Robert A. Hyde,et al.  Mnemonic representations of transient stimuli and temporal sequences in the rodent hippocampus in vitro , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Barry,et al.  Specific evidence of low-dimensional continuous attractor dynamics in grid cells , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Yuan Gao,et al.  Semilunar Granule Cells: Glutamatergic Neurons in the Rat Dentate Gyrus with Axon Collaterals in the Inner Molecular Layer , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  H. Scharfman,et al.  A role for hilar cells in pattern separation in the dentate gyrus: A computational approach , 2009, Hippocampus.

[9]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[10]  Maoz Shamir,et al.  Emerging principles of population coding: in search for the neural code , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Prefrontal neuronal activity in rhesus monkeys performing a delayed anti-saccade task , 1993, Nature.

[12]  H. Scharfman,et al.  Electrophysiology of morphologically identified mossy cells of the dentate hilus recorded in guinea pig hippocampal slices , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[14]  Dmitri B. Chklovskii,et al.  Neuronal Circuits Underlying Persistent Representations Despite Time Varying Activity , 2012, Current Biology.

[15]  Eric Shea-Brown,et al.  Triplet correlations among similarly tuned cells impact population coding , 2015, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[16]  H S Seung,et al.  How the brain keeps the eyes still. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  William R. Softky,et al.  The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  K. Miller,et al.  One-Dimensional Dynamics of Attention and Decision Making in LIP , 2008, Neuron.

[19]  Rava Azeredo da Silveira,et al.  High-Fidelity Coding with Correlated Neurons , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  M. Moser,et al.  Pattern Separation in the Dentate Gyrus and CA3 of the Hippocampus , 2007, Science.

[21]  A. Compte,et al.  Bump attractor dynamics in prefrontal cortex explains behavioral precision in spatial working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.