Intrinsic constraints on language: Grammar and hermeneutics

Functional and pragmatic approaches to grammar, and to language more broadly, are well known. All of these approaches, however, accept a core aspect of sentences, or utterances, as consisting of encodings of propositions. They proceed on their functional and pragmatic explorations with this much, at least, taken for granted. I wish to argue, to the contrary, that the functional characteristics of utterances penetrate even to the level of the structure - the grammar - of supposed propositional encodings. More specifically, I argue that the structure that is taken as a structure of propositional encodings is not that at all, but is instead a structure of functionally organized action. Constraints on such structures, in turn - constraints on grammars - emerge as intrinsic constraints on that functional organization. My point will of necessity be made programmatically, since to fill it out completely would be to complete a functional version of universal grammar. The mere logical possibility of intrinsic constraints on the grammatical possibilities of language refutes attempts to construe grammatical constraints as logically arbitrary. Typically, because grammatical constraints are construed as being (logically) arbitrary, some additional explanation of the constraints is required should those constraints be shown or argued to be universal. That additional explanation is usually some equally logically arbitrary innateness postulate. I will show that the possibility of intrinsic grammatical constraints invalidates standard arguments for such innateness - specifically, that such a possibility invalidates the poverty of the stimulus argument. Grammatical constraints are not the only characteristics of language that are intrinsic to its nature. I also show how phenomena of implicature, the hermeneutic circle, and forms of creative language can be understood as being naturally emergent in the functional nature of language. Most broadly, then, intrinsic constraints constitute a rich realm for exploration in attempting to understand language.

[1]  R. L. Campbell,et al.  Clearing the ground: Foundational questions once again , 1992 .

[2]  J. Koster Domains and dynasties: The radical autonomy of syntax , 1987 .

[3]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Representational content in humans and machines , 1993, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[4]  Ann,et al.  Truth and method , 1994, Journal of Religion and Health.

[5]  Rolf George,et al.  The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap , 1996 .

[6]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience , 1991 .

[7]  P. French,et al.  Contemporary perspectives in the philosophy of language , 1989 .

[8]  Jaan Valsiner,et al.  Children's Development Within Social Contexts: Metatheoretical, Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 1992 .

[9]  M. Bickhard The Import of Fodor’s Anti-Constructivist Argument , 1991 .

[10]  R. Swinburne,et al.  The Philosophy of Karl Popper , 1975 .

[11]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Cognition, convention, and communication , 1980 .

[12]  H. B. Allen,et al.  A Functional Grammar , 1946 .

[13]  G. Ferro-Luzzi On Evolutionary Epistemology , 1982, Current Anthropology.

[14]  Jeffrey C. King Instantial terms, anaphora and arbitrary objects , 1991 .

[15]  Robert D. Van Valin,et al.  Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar , 1984 .

[16]  David Kaplan,et al.  On the logic of demonstratives , 1979, J. Philos. Log..

[17]  Michael Don Palmer,et al.  Reflections on language , 1977 .

[18]  Noam Chomsky Language and Problems of Knowledge , 1987 .

[19]  Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini,et al.  Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky , 1980 .

[20]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science - impasse and solution , 1995, Advances in psychology.

[21]  Maya Hickmann,et al.  Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought , 1989 .

[22]  G. Libben,et al.  Noam Chomsky : consensus and controversy , 1990 .

[23]  Jeffrey C. King,et al.  Intentional identity generalized , 1993, J. Philos. Log..

[24]  Josef Vachek,et al.  Β. FUNCTIONAL SYNTAX , 1975 .

[25]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Truth and Method , 1960 .

[26]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[27]  L. Wittgenstein Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus , 2021, Nordic Wittgenstein Review.

[28]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Some foundational questions concerning language studies: With a focus on categorial grammars and model-theoretic possible worlds semantics , 1992 .

[29]  M. Silverstein Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description , 1976 .

[30]  Petr Sgall,et al.  The Meaning Of The Sentence In Its Semantic And Pragmatic Aspects , 1986 .

[31]  Jeffrey C. King Pronouns, descriptions, and the semantics of discourse , 1987 .

[32]  R. Horton Rules and representations , 1993, The Lancet.

[33]  T. Mccarthy,et al.  Understanding and Social Inquiry , 1977 .

[34]  Peter F. Strawson,et al.  Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar , 1976 .

[35]  Pronouns and pronominal descriptions: A new semantical category , 1984 .

[36]  Paul Ricoeur,et al.  The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text , 1973 .

[37]  K. Basso,et al.  Meaning in Anthropology , 1976 .

[38]  Territoire Urbain,et al.  Convention , 1955, Hidden Nature.