Is the Liberal Peace Just an Artifact of Cold War

Recent research indicates that democracy and economic interdependence reduce the probability that a pair of states will engage in a militarized interstate dispute. These analyses were largely confined to the cold war era, however, leading some to argue that the results are an artifact of the particular bipolar configuration of alliances and interests characteristic of that period. To determine whether this is so, we present two sets of analyses here. First, with new trade data for sixteen countries, 1870–1989, we use logistic analysis of cross‐sectional and time‐series data to test whether democracy and economic openness (total exports as a proportion of gross domestic product) had the same conflict‐reducing effects before World War II as after. We find they did, while the effect of alliances is weak. Moreover, our theoretical model offers a plausible explanation of the outbreak of World War I that is consistent with the liberal peace. Second, for the cold war era, we address the question of whether state...

[1]  Z. Maoz.  Domestic sources of global change , 1996 .

[2]  Henry S. Farber,et al.  Building Bridges Abroad , 1997 .

[3]  Randolph M. Siverson,et al.  The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[4]  A. Maddison.  The World Economy in the 20th Century , 1989 .

[5]  William J. Dixon,et al.  Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[6]  W. Domke,et al.  War and the changing global system , 1988 .

[7]  Bruce Bueno de Mesquita,et al.  War and Reason , 1992 .

[8]  J. O'neal,et al.  The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985 , 1997 .

[9]  Bruce Russett,et al.  The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–85 , 1998, International Organization.

[10]  P. Diggle,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 2003 .

[11]  Margaret G. Hermann,et al.  Rethinking Democracy and International Peace: Perspectives from Political Psychology , 1995 .

[12]  Herman Wold,et al.  The Fix-Point Approach to Interdependent Systems Review and Current Outlook , 1981 .

[13]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable , 1998 .

[14]  Soo Yeon Kim,et al.  The new politics of voting alignments in the United Nations General Assembly , 1996, International Organization.

[15]  R. Cobden.  The Political Writings of Richard Cobden , 1973 .

[16]  J. Kugler,et al.  Parity and War: Evaluations and Extensions of The War Ledger , 1996 .

[17]  Bruce Bueno de Mesquita,et al.  The War Trap , 1981 .

[18]  Kenneth N. Waltz,et al.  Theory of International Politics , 1979 .

[19]  Harvey Starr,et al.  International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Substitutability, and “Nice” Laws , 1984, World Politics.

[20]  J. David Singer,et al.  Nations at War: A Scientific Study of International Conflict , 1998 .

[21]  A. Maddison,et al.  Monitoring the world economy, 1820-1992 , 1995 .

[22]  Henry S. Farber,et al.  Polities and Peace , 1995 .

[23]  Zeev Maoz,et al.  Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986 , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[24]  K. Deutsch,et al.  National Industrialization and the Declining Share of the International Economic Sector, 1890–1959 , 1961, World Politics.

[25]  Brian M. Pollins,et al.  Linking the Levels: The long Wave and Shifts in U , 1999 .

[26]  Indra de Soysa,et al.  Testing Power-Transition Theory Using Alternative Measures of National Capabilities , 1997 .

[27]  Peter Burke,et al.  Log-linear models , 1980 .

[28]  Nazli Choucri,et al.  Nations in Conflict: National Growth and International Violence , 1975 .

[29]  S. B. Fay.  The origins of the World War , 1930 .

[30]  Erik Gartzke,et al.  Kant We All Just get Along? Opportunity, Willingness, and the Origins of the Democratic Peace , 1998 .

[31]  L. J. Barker.  Limits of Political Strategy: A Systemic View of the African American Experience , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[32]  Bruce Russett,et al.  Democratic Trading Partners: The Liberal Connection, 1962-1989 , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[33]  S. Bremer.  Dangerous Dyads , 1992 .

[34]  H. J. Arnold.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[35]  J. Ray,et al.  New Tests of the Democratic Peace: Controlling for Economic Interdependence, 1950-85 , 1997 .

[36]  Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered , 1997 .

[37]  Joshua S. Goldstein.  Long Cycles: Prosperity and War in the Modern Age , 1988 .

[38]  J. Davis.  The Logic Of Causal Order , 1987 .

[39]  A. Maddison,et al.  Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: A Long-Run Comparative View , 1991 .

[40]  Jan Kmenta,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1988 .

[41]  Katherine Barbieri.  Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict? , 1996 .

[42]  J. C. Campbell,et al.  Treaties and Alliances of the World , 1981 .

[43]  Ted Robert Gurr,et al.  Transitions to Democracy: Tracking Democracy''s Third Wave with the Polity III Data , 1996 .

[44]  Zeev Maoz,et al.  The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950-85 , 1996 .

[45]  William Reed,et al.  Regime types and status quo evaluations: Power transition theory and the democratic peace , 1996 .

[46]  B. Russett,et al.  The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992 , 1999, World Politics.

[47]  William R. Thompson,et al.  A Tale of Two Democratic Peace Critiques , 1997 .

[48]  Z. Maoz,et al.  Realist and Cultural Critiques of the Democratic Peace: A Theoretical and Empirical Reassessment , 1998 .