The measurement of social support in the 'European Research on Incapacitating Diseases and Social Support': the development of the Social Support Questionnaire for Transactions (SSQT).

Social support is supposed to have a beneficial effect on the health and wellbeing of people. It is a central concept in the 'EUropean Research on Incapacitating DIseases and Social Support' (EURIDISS). In general, two main distinctions concerning social support are made in the literature, providing four basic dimensions or types of social support: a social-emotional vs an instrumental type of social support, and a 'crisis' or 'problem-oriented' vs 'everyday' or 'daily' type of social support. Based on these types of social support, a series of items were formulated to measure actual supportive interactions or exchanges of resources. The items were spread over five scales. The social-emotional type of social support comprised three scales: daily emotional support; problem-oriented emotional support; and social companionship, while the instrumental type of social support consisted of two scales: the daily instrumental support and the problem-oriented instrumental support. Together, these items and scales constitute the so-called 'Social Support Questionnaire for Transactions' (SSQT). The main objective of this paper is to investigate whether one and the same instrument, i.e. the SSQT, allows for meaningful comparisons between patients with rheumatoid arthritis from different countries. More specifically, the dimensionality and invariance of the dimensions across countries of the SSQT are explored. To this end, patients from four different European countries (France, Norway, The Netherlands and Sweden) were asked to fill in the SSQT. The analysis of the data using principal component analysis (PCA) and simultaneous component analysis (SCA), did yield the intended scales, although the internal consistency of one of them, the daily instrumental support scale, is questionable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  I. Sarason,et al.  Assessing Social Support: The Social Support Questionnaire. , 1983 .

[2]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[3]  Cheri Register,et al.  LIVING WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS , 1987 .

[4]  J. Morrissey,et al.  Social support and health: a review. , 1993, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  S. Shumaker,et al.  Toward a Theory of Social Support: Closing Conceptual Gaps , 1984 .

[6]  O. Steinbrocker,et al.  Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1949, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[7]  F. Arnett.  Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[8]  M. Bury.  The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects , 1991 .

[9]  C. Wiener.  The burden of rheumatoid arthritis: tolerating the uncertainty. , 1975, Social science & medicine.

[10]  M. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  Social support, social disability, and psychological well-being in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1994, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[11]  M J Stewart,et al.  Social support: diverse theoretical perspectives. , 1989, Social Science & Medicine (1967).

[12]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[13]  Main and Interactive Effects of Social Support: Response to LaRocco , 1983 .

[14]  Duncan Cramer,et al.  Quantitative data analysis for social scientists , 1990 .

[15]  A. Vaux.  Social Support: Theory, Research, and Intervention , 1988 .

[16]  B. Wellman,et al.  Social Support, Life Events, and Depression , 1985 .

[17]  Roger E. Millsap,et al.  Component analysis in cross-sectional and longitudinal data , 1988 .

[18]  K. Heller,et al.  Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies , 1983, American journal of community psychology.

[19]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  Michael Bury,et al.  Living With Chronic Illness: The Experience of Patients and Their Families , 1988 .

[21]  Josephus Martinus Berge.  Optimizing factorial invariance , 1977 .

[22]  Julius A. Roth,et al.  The experience and management of chronic illness , 1987 .

[23]  P. Thoits.  Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. , 1982, Journal of health and social behavior.

[24]  M. Waltz,et al.  Social support and the quality of life following myocardial infarction , 1984 .

[25]  W. P. Dixon,et al.  BMPD statistical software manual , 1988 .

[26]  Marybeth Shinn,et al.  Social Interaction and Social Support , 1984 .

[27]  Nan Lin,et al.  2 – Conceptualizing Social Support , 1986 .

[28]  F. Gregor,et al.  Dyadic social-support for cardiac surgery patients--a Canadian approach. , 1987, Social science & medicine.

[29]  L. Tucker.  A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS STUDIES , 1951 .

[30]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  A Procedure for Surveying Personal Networks , 1978 .

[31]  R. Sanderman,et al.  Social support, rheumatoid arthritis and quality of life: concepts, measurement and research. , 1993, Patient education and counseling.

[32]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  A Brief Measure of Social Support: Practical and Theoretical Implications , 1987 .