Assessing occupant comfort in an iconic sustainable education building

The building that houses the Mirvac School of Sustainable Development at Bond University is the first educational building to achieve a six Green Star rating from the Green Building Council of Australia. It has won numerous awards since opening in August 2008 including being judged the RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors) Sustainable Building of 2009. After more than two years in use a post-occupancy evaluation study was carried out to assess the performance of the building from the viewpoint of the users; both resident staff and transient students. Results for factors such as lighting, thermal comfort, noise and air quality. were compared to benchmarks established by the Usable Buildings Trust. The evaluation also assessed the occupants’ perceptions of the building’s impact on their own productivity. Users generally find the building provides a comfortable work environment although a number of areas of performance were noted as posing some concerns. These included intrusive noise in some parts of the building and some issues with glare in daylit teaching spaces. Such concerns were found to be in accord with the results of previous studies and they highlight some recurrent problems in “green” buildings designed to maximise the use of natural ventilation and natural light. These design challenges and how occupant satisfaction is to be measured and benchmarked are also discussed in the context of this comparative building study.

[1]  Le Thomas,et al.  'Green' buildings: What Australian users are saying , 2007 .

[2]  Kent F. Spreckelmeyer,et al.  Measuring Overall Architectural Quality , 1982 .

[3]  Warren L. Paul,et al.  A comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building , 2008 .

[4]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  User Satisfaction in Sustainable Office Buildings: A Preliminary Study , 2011 .

[5]  Rick Best Specifying and sourcing materials for best practice sustainable education facility , 2010 .

[6]  Hasim Altan,et al.  A comparison of the occupant comfort in a conventional high-rise office block and a contemporary env , 2011 .

[7]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Building evaluation: practice and principles , 2010 .

[8]  George Baird,et al.  Sustainable Buildings in Practice: What the Users Think , 2010 .

[9]  Brian Edwards,et al.  Benefits of green offices in the UK: analysis from examples built in the 1990s , 2006 .

[10]  Sheila Walbe Ornstein A Postoccupancy Evaluation of Workplaces in São Paulo, Brazil , 1999 .

[11]  L. Armitage,et al.  Green offices in Australia: a user perception survey , 2011 .

[12]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Relationships between Office Characteristics and Employee Reactions: A Study of the Physical Environment. , 1983 .

[13]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Are users more tolerant of ‘green’ buildings? , 2007 .

[14]  G. Clausen,et al.  The effects of moderate heat stress and open-plan office noise distraction on SBS symptoms and on the performance of office work. , 2004, Indoor air.

[15]  Jacqueline C. Vischer,et al.  The concept of environmental comfort in workplace performance , 2008 .

[16]  Jacqueline C. Vischer,et al.  Towards an Environmental Psychology of Workspace: How People are Affected by Environments for Work , 2008 .