From research to action: now we have to move on CCS communication

With rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), a portfolio of mitigation options is deemed essential as we transition to a low carbon economy. Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) is one technology that has the potential to mitigate large amounts of CO2 and governments around the world, along with industry and researchers working in the technology space, are excited by this. However, the technology still remains relatively unknown in the minds of most lay citizens and is therefore less well accepted than more traditional forms of power generation. This paper reviews a number of CCS communication research activities that have been undertaken internationally since 2002 and synthesizes them into a logical roadmap of activities. The paper also examines the common strengths and weaknesses of the research activities and makes a number of suggestions for industry representatives and policy makers. The paper also outlines a way to segment stakeholder groups for all communication activities into four target audiences including: influential others; community; education and project specific activities.

[1]  André Faaij,et al.  How the Dutch evaluate CCS options in comparison with other CO2 mitigation options : results of a nationwide Information-Choice Questionnaire survey , 2008 .

[2]  Clair Gough,et al.  Media framing of new technology, the case of carbon capture and storage , 2006 .

[3]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options , 2009 .

[4]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey , 2004 .

[5]  H. Herzog,et al.  American exceptionalism? Similarities and differences in national attitudes toward energy policy and global warming. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[7]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[8]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  Elizabeth L. Malone,et al.  Moving from misinformation derived from public attitude surveys on carbon dioxide capture and storage towards realistic stakeholder involvement , 2010 .

[10]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  How aware is the public of carbon capture and storage , 2005 .

[11]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  Engaging the public on carbon dioxide capture and storage: Does a large group process work? , 2009 .

[12]  H. D. Coninck,et al.  Carbon dioxide capture and storage: Public perception, policy and regulatory issues in the Netherlands , 2005 .

[13]  M. Akai,et al.  Public acceptance of CO2 capture and storage technology: A survey of public opinion to explore influential factors , 2005 .

[14]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Ocean Carbon Sequestration: A Case Study in Public and Institutional Perceptions , 2003 .

[15]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Yasuko Mori,et al.  Exploration of public acceptance regarding CO2 underground sequestration technologies , 2005 .

[17]  Peter Neijens,et al.  Opinion quality in public opinion research , 1997 .