Rational Inefficient Compromises in Negotiation 1

Korhonen, Phillips, Teich and Wallenius (1998), in their letter to the Editor, observe with some dismay that people are often not willing to improve the compromises they have achieved through negotiations and provide some possible explanations and remedies. In this note we attempt to address several of the concerns raised in the letter and point the reader to relevant literature. Acceptance of inefficient compromises has been researched from different perspectives, as we note in section 2, and we suggest that several possible explanations already exist. Some of them are presented in Sections 3 and 4. The type of the experiment that has been used may also provide some insights as indicated in Section 5. Implications for decision and negotiation support are briefly discussed in Section 6 and a brief conclusion in Section 7.

[1]  Nancy J. Adler,et al.  Cross-Cultural Interaction: The International Comparison Fallacy? , 1989 .

[2]  A. Roth,et al.  Considerations of Fairness and Strategy: Experimental Data from Sequential Games , 1992 .

[3]  D. G. Johnson,et al.  The Role and Effectiveness of Theories of Decision in Practice , 1977 .

[4]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation , 1991 .

[5]  Paul N. Finlay,et al.  The state of decision support systems: A review , 1989 .

[6]  Michael P. Wellman Rationality in Decision Machines , 1995 .

[7]  Elaine B. Hyder,et al.  Knowledge Matters: The Effect of Tactical Descriptions on Negotiation Behavior and Outcome , 1996 .

[8]  E. McClennen Rationality and dynamic choice , 1990 .

[9]  Farrokh Alemi,et al.  A Demonstration of Methods for Studying Negotiations Between Physicians and Health Care Managers , 1990 .

[10]  A. Rapoport,et al.  An Experimental Study of Buyer-Seller Negotiation with One-Sided Incomplete Information and Time Discounting , 1995 .

[11]  Anthony C. Stylianou,et al.  Expert support systems: integrating AI technologies , 1993, CACM.

[12]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Albert A. Angehrn Computers that Criticize You: Stimulus-Based Decision Support Systems , 1993 .

[14]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness and Interpersonal Conflict , 1992 .

[15]  Jeffrey Z. Rubin,et al.  Culture and negotiation : the resolution of water disputes , 1993 .

[16]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Negotiator Rationality and Negotiator Cognition: The Interactive Roles of Prescriptive and Descriptive Research , 1991 .

[17]  Simon French,et al.  A manifesto for the new MCDA era , 1993 .

[18]  Peter Bennett,et al.  Modelling Decisions in International Relations: Game Theory and Beyond , 1995 .

[19]  S. French,et al.  Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality. , 1988 .

[20]  N Howard,et al.  n-person ‘soft’ games , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[21]  Mordechai I. Henig,et al.  SOLVING MCDM PROBLEMS: PROCESS CONCEPTS , 1996 .

[22]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Rational agents, contract curves, and inefficient compromises , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[23]  P. Finlay Introducing Decision Support Systems , 1994 .

[24]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Negotiation via the World Wide Web: A Cross-cultural Study of Decision Making , 1999 .

[25]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  An active intelligent decision support system - Architecture and simulation , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..