On a branch-and-bound approach for a Huff-like Stackelberg location problem

Modelling the location decision of two competing firms that intend to build a new facility in a planar market can be done by a Huff-like Stackelberg location problem. In a Huff-like model, the market share captured by a firm is given by a gravity model determined by distance calculations to facilities. In a Stackelberg model, the leader is the firm that locates first and takes into account the actions of the competing chain (follower) locating a new facility after the leader. The follower problem is known to be a hard global optimisation problem. The leader problem is even harder, since the leader has to decide on location given the optimal action of the follower. So far, in literature only heuristic approaches have been tested to solve the leader problem. Our research question is to solve the leader problem rigorously in the sense of having a guarantee on the reached accuracy. To answer this question, we develop a branch-and-bound approach. Essentially, the bounding is based on the zero sum concept: what is gain for one chain is loss for the other. We also discuss several ways of creating bounds for the underlying (follower) sub-problems, and show their performance for numerical cases.

[1]  Frank Plastria,et al.  Optimal location and design of a competitive facility , 2004, Math. Program..

[2]  F. Plastria GBSSS: The generalized big square small square method for planar single-facility location , 1992 .

[3]  Frank Plastria,et al.  Static competitive facility location: An overview of optimisation approaches , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Inmaculada García,et al.  Infeasibility spheres for finding robust solutions of blending problems with quadratic constraints , 2007, J. Glob. Optim..

[5]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  Sequential location problems , 1997 .

[6]  S. Hakimi On locating new facilities in a competitive environment , 1983 .

[7]  Blas Pelegrín,et al.  Solving a Huff-like competitive location and design model for profit maximization in the plane , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  L. G. Mitten Branch-and-Bound Methods: General Formulation and Properties , 1970, Oper. Res..

[9]  Gilbert Laporte,et al.  Competitive Location Models: A Framework and Bibliography , 1993, Transp. Sci..

[10]  Horst A. Eiselt,et al.  An alternating heuristic for medianoid and centroid problems in the plane , 2003, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Faiz A. Al-Khayyal,et al.  A D.C. optimization method for single facility location problems , 1995, J. Glob. Optim..

[12]  Tammy Drezner,et al.  Competitive Facility Location in the Plane , 1995 .

[13]  Tammy Drezner,et al.  Locating a single new facility among existing unequally attractive facilities , 1994 .

[14]  Toshihide Ibaraki,et al.  Theoretical comparisons of search strategies in branch-and-bound algorithms , 1976, International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences.

[15]  Zvi Drezner,et al.  Finding the optimal solution to the Huff based competitive location model , 2004, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[16]  Z. Drezner,et al.  Replacing continuous demand with discrete demand in a competitive location model , 1997 .

[17]  Z. Drezner,et al.  FACILITY LOCATION IN ANTICIPATION OF FUTURE COMPETITION. , 1998 .

[18]  Z. Drezner Competitive location strategies for two facilities , 1982 .

[19]  T. Drezner Optimal continuous location of a retail facility, facility attractiveness, and market share: An interactive model , 1994 .