Understanding employees' reactions to supervisors' influence behaviors: A community sample predicting employee commitment, turnover, and stress

Purpose – This study seeks to demonstrate that employees' reactions to their supervisors' influence behaviors are governed by meanings inferred from the behaviors. Another aim is to develop a method in which “weights” for predicting employees' reactions are assigned using mean ratings of perceptions of the features and social/organizational implications of the influence behaviors.Design/methodology/approach – Employees of an energy utility completed survey questionnaires concerning the extent of their supervisors' use of specified influence tactics. Employees' organizational commitment, supervisor commitment, turnover intention, and stress also were surveyed. A separate, community sample rated the influence tactics for dimensions of meaning or implications of the tactics. Data from the two samples were combined in a novel arithmetic scoring procedure as one of several analyses looking for evidence of the specified dimensions' effects.Findings – The study finds that employees' work attitudes and other outc...

[1]  G. Yukl,et al.  Consequences of Influence Tactics Used With Subordinates, Peers, and the Boss , 1992 .

[2]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. , 1990 .

[3]  M. Erez,et al.  The two sides of the tactics of influence: agent vs. target , 1986 .

[4]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's Way , 1980 .

[5]  B. Avolio,et al.  Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. , 2007, The American psychologist.

[6]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Do Leaders' Influence Tactics Relate to Members' Helping Behavior? IT Depends on the Quality of the Relationship , 2006 .

[7]  P. Hom.  Employee Turnover , 1994 .

[8]  J. Seltzer,et al.  Supervisory Leadership and Subordinate Burnout , 1988 .

[9]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[10]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  CONSEQUENCES FOR MANAGERS OF USING SINGLE INFLUENCE TACTICS AND COMBINATIONS OF TACTICS , 1992 .

[11]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Motivation and Work Behaviour , 1978 .

[12]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Healthy Work : Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life , 1990 .

[13]  T. Tyler,et al.  Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. , 1990 .

[15]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[16]  Remus Ilies,et al.  Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  William H. Mobley,et al.  Employee turnover : causes, consequences, and control , 1983 .

[18]  Letitia Anne Peplau,et al.  Power strategies in intimate relationships. , 1980 .

[19]  T. Falbo.  Multidimensional scaling of power strategies. , 1977 .

[20]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Leadership Processes and Follower Self-identity , 2003 .

[21]  John P. Allegrante,et al.  Organizational climate and work stress: a general framework applied to inner-city schoolteachers. , 1995 .

[22]  B. Raven,et al.  The Bases of Power: Origins and Recent Developments. A Presentation in Honor of John R. P. French on the Occasion of His Receiving the Kurt Lewin Award. , 1992 .