MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are a recent addition to the range of online learning options. Since 2008, MOOCs have been run by a variety of public and elite universities, especially in North America. Many academics have taken interest in MOOCs recognising the potential to deliver education around the globe on an unprecedented scale; some of these academics are taking a research-oriented perspective and academic papers describing their research are starting to appear in the traditional media of peer reviewed publications. This paper presents a systematic review of the published MOOC literature (2008-2012): Forty-five peer reviewed papers are identified through journals, database searches, searching the Web, and chaining from known sources to form the base for this review. We believe this is the first effort to systematically review literature relating to MOOCs, a fairly recent but massively popular phenomenon with a global reach. The review categorises the literature into eight different areas of interest, introductory, concept, case studies, educational theory, technology, participant focussed, provider focussed, and other, while also providing quantitative analysis of publications according to publication type, year of publication, and contributors. Future research directions guided by gaps in the literature are explored.

[1]  H. Fournier,et al.  New dimensions to self-directed learning in an open networked learning environment , 2012 .

[2]  Arlene Fink,et al.  Conducting research literature reviews : from the internet to paper , 2014 .

[3]  Ke Zhang,et al.  Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008-2011 , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Paul Hyman.  In the year of disruptive education , 2012, CACM.

[5]  Trudie Aberdeen.  Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. , 2013, The Canadian Journal of Action Research.

[6]  Martin Weller.  Learning objects, learning design, and adoption through succession , 2007, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[7]  Hélène Fournier,et al.  The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment , 2011, LAK.

[8]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Disruptive Pedagogies and Technologies in Universities , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[9]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Management of change , 2007 .

[10]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[11]  Brad Mehlenbacher.  Massive open online courses (MOOCs): educational innovation or threat to higher education? , 2012, OSDOC '12.

[12]  J. Cabiria,et al.  Connectivist learning environments : Massive open online courses , 2012 .

[13]  ZimmerMichael.  But the data is already public , 2010 .

[14]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  J. Mackness,et al.  Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience , 2012 .

[16]  Rebecca J. Hogue,et al.  Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education , 2011 .

[17]  Moshe Y. Vardi.  Will MOOCs destroy academia? , 2012, CACM.

[18]  George Siemens,et al.  The MOOC model for digital practice , 2010 .

[19]  Roy Williams,et al.  Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC , 2010 .

[20]  Parvinder Gupta,et al.  Management of Organizational Change , 1998 .

[21]  Andy Lane,et al.  Are open educational resources systematic or systemic change agents for teaching practice? , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  Stephen Downes,et al.  Places to Go: Connectivism & Connective Knowledge , 2008 .

[23]  Helene Fournier,et al.  A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses , 2011 .

[24]  M. Zimmer.  “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[25]  Shirley Williams,et al.  Use of open educational resources in higher education , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  Dalit Levy,et al.  Troubleshooting MOOCs: The Case of a Massive Open Online Course at a College of Education , 2012 .

[27]  Shirley Williams,et al.  What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers , 2013, J. Documentation.

[28]  Fiona Carroll,et al.  Cloud Computing and Creativity: Learning on a Massive Open Online Course , 2011 .

[29]  Peter B. Henderson,et al.  Software engineering education (SEEd): is software engineering ready for MOOCs? , 2012, SOEN.

[30]  Jaakko Kurhila,et al.  Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming , 2012, SIGITE '12.

[31]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[32]  Sanjit A. Seshia,et al.  Automating exercise generation: a step towards meeting the MOOC challenge for embedded systems , 2012, WESE '12.

[33]  Roy Williams,et al.  The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC , 2010 .

[34]  Dan W. Butin.  What MIT Should Have Done , 2012, ELERN.

[35]  Fred G. Martin,et al.  Will massive open online courses change how we teach? , 2012, CACM.

[36]  David Bull.  From ripple to tsunami: the possible impact of MOOCs on higher education , 2012 .

[37]  Lisa Chamberlin,et al.  MOOCs: Massive Open Online Courses or Massive and Often Obtuse Courses? , 2011, ELERN.

[38]  Tharindu R. Liyanagunawardena,et al.  Information communication technologies and distance education in Sri Lanka: a case study of two universities , 2012 .

[39]  Antonio Fini,et al.  The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools , 2009 .

[40]  Shruti Kohli,et al.  Evolution of user dependent model to predict future usability of a search engine , 2011, 2011 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies.

[41]  Sean C. Abajian,et al.  Emotive Vocabulary in MOOCs: Context & Participant Retention , 2012 .

[42]  Roderick Sims.  Rethinking (e)learning: a manifesto for connected generations , 2008 .

[43]  Frances Bell,et al.  Network theories for technology-enabled learning and social change: Connectivism and actor network theory , 2010 .

[44]  Steven Frank,et al.  Review: MITx's online circuit and analysis course [Education] , 2012, IEEE Spectrum.

[45]  Katy Mahraj.  Using Information Expertise to Enhance Massive Open Online Courses , 2012 .

[46]  Peggy Lynn MacIsaac.  What a librarian can bring to your open online course development team. , 2012 .

[47]  Rebecca J. Hogue,et al.  How to Succeed in a MOOC - Massive Online Open Course (Oct 12) , 2012 .

[48]  David Ellis,et al.  A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design , 1989, J. Documentation.

[49]  George Siemens.  Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[50]  K. Masters.  A Brief Guide To Understanding MOOCs , 2011 .

[51]  Keith Kirkwood.  The wisdom of the clouds: distributed learning, MOOCs, edupunks, and the challenge to formal education , 2010 .

[52]  K. Sawyer,et al.  Challenge and change. , 1971, Archives of surgery.

[53]  Antonella Esposito,et al.  Research Ethics in Emerging Forms of Online Learning: Issues Arising from a Hypothetical Study on a MOOC. , 2012 .

[54]  Rita Kop,et al.  The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course , 2011 .

[55]  David Ellis,et al.  Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment , 1997, J. Documentation.

[56]  Michael Sean Gallagher,et al.  Exploring the MOOC format as a pedagogical approach for mLearning , 2011 .

[57]  C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.  MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. , 2012 .

[58]  D. Casey.  A Journey to Legitimacy: The Historical Development of Distance Education through Technology , 2008 .

[59]  F. Bell.  Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning , 2011 .