Estimating the necessary sampling size of surface soil moisture at different scales using a random combination method

Summary To develop a sampling strategy of surface soil moisture, a random combination method (RCM) was proposed and used to estimate the necessary sampling size (NSS) of soil moisture at different sampling areas. The RCM was developed based on the bootstrap sampling procedure and consideration of all possible sub-sampling combinations of available data. To examine the method, field experiments were conducted in sampling domains of 10 × 10, 20 × 20, 40 × 40, 55 × 55, 80 × 80, and 160 × 160 m 2 . Comparisons of the RCM with other commonly used sampling methods, including the statistical, geostatistical, stratified sampling, and bootstrap methods, indicated that the RCM provided rational and efficient sampling strategies. Under the same accuracy, estimated NSS values using the RCM were much smaller than those by the statistical and bootstrap methods. In addition, the RCM has the advantage of requiring less input information, whereas the statistical and stratified sampling methods require independent data with the normal distribution, the stratified sampling method requires stratified allocation information, and the geostatistical method requires the semivariogram model. The RCM was applied to estimate the NSS of soil moisture at different scales (i.e. squares with sides of 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 m). Estimated values of the NSS under confidence levels of 90% and 95% with relative errors of 5% and 10% were linearly related to the coefficients of variation calculated from the experimental data. To enhance calculation efficiency of the RCM, the procedure was simplified using a small sub-sample size, which dramatically reduced the computation time for the NSS estimation.

[1]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[2]  J. H. Dane,et al.  Estimating Soil Parameters and Sample Size by Bootstrapping 1 , 1986 .

[3]  R. Webster,et al.  Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. II. Block kriging. , 1980 .

[4]  B. Manly Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 2018 .

[5]  B. Trangmar,et al.  Use of Geostatistics in Designing Sampling Strategies for Soil Survey , 1989 .

[6]  D. J. Brus,et al.  A sampling scheme for estimating the mean extractable phosphorus concentration of fields for environmental regulation , 1999 .

[7]  R. O. Gilbert Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring , 1987 .

[8]  C. Chung,et al.  Sampling strategies for fertility on a Stoy silt loam soil , 1995 .

[9]  Venkat Lakshmi,et al.  Retrieval of soil moisture from passive and active L/S band sensor (PALS) observations during the Soil Moisture Experiment in 2002 (SMEX02) , 2004 .

[10]  Tien Yin Wong,et al.  Prevalence of lens opacity in Chinese residents of Singapore: the tanjong pagar survey. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[11]  Sang-Min Park,et al.  Soil–landscape delineation to define spatial sampling domains for hillslope hydrology , 2004 .

[12]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Spatial and temporal characteristics of soil moisture in an intensively monitored agricultural field (OPE3) , 2006 .

[13]  Kai-Tai Fang,et al.  A stratified sampling model in spherical feature inspection using coordinate measuring machines , 2001 .

[14]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Intraseasonal dynamics of soil moisture variability within a small agricultural maize cropped field , 2002 .

[15]  Subsurface topography to enhance the prediction of the spatial distribution of soil wetness , 2003 .

[16]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes , 2004 .

[17]  J. Treasurer,et al.  Selection of host sample number and design of a monitoring programme for ectoparasitic sea lice (Copepoda: Caligidae) on farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar , 2000 .

[18]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  HOW MANY OBSERVATIONS ARE NEEDED FOR REGIONAL ESTIMATION OF SOIL PROPERTIES? , 1983 .

[19]  M. Vidal,et al.  A soil sampling strategy for mapping trace element concentrations in a test area. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Arthur W. Warrick,et al.  Soil Physics Companion , 2001 .

[21]  A. McBratney,et al.  Soil spatial variability , 2000 .

[22]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Soil moisture spatial variability in experimental areas of central Italy , 2007 .

[23]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect: Rattlesnake Hill, Texas , 1998 .

[24]  Douglas A. Miller,et al.  SMEX02: Field scale variability, time stability and similarity of soil moisture , 2004 .

[25]  R. Webster,et al.  Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties: I The semi‐variogram and punctual kriging , 1980, European Journal of Soil Science.

[26]  Keith Beven,et al.  Dispersion parameters for undisturbed partially saturated soil. , 1993 .

[27]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  Sampling strategies to estimate field areal evapotranspiration fluxes with a soil water balance approach , 2004 .

[28]  A. Warrick Soil Water Dynamics , 2003 .

[29]  W. Wallender,et al.  PLOTSIZE AND SAMPLE NUMBER FOR NEUTRON PROBE MEASUREMENTS IN SMALL FIELD TRIALS , 1993 .

[30]  G. Hergert,et al.  Comparison of procedures for estimating sample numbers , 1995 .

[31]  Manwar Hossain,et al.  Soil salinity of urban turf areas irrigated with saline water: I. Spatial variability , 2005 .