Contextual override of pragmatic anomalies: Evidence from eye movements

Readers typically experience processing difficulty when they encounter a word that is anomalous within the local context, such as 'The mouse picked up the dynamite...'. The research reported here demonstrates that by placing a sentence in a fictional scenario that is already well known to the reader (e.g., a Tom and Jerry cartoon, as a context for the example sentence above), the difficulty usually associated with these pragmatic anomalies can be immediately eliminated, as reflected in participants' eye movement behaviour. This finding suggests that readers can rapidly integrate information from their common ground, specifically, their cultural knowledge, whilst interpreting incoming text, and provides further evidence that incoming words are immediately integrated within the global discourse.

[1]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[4]  Merrill F. Garrett,et al.  Sentence processing , 1990 .

[5]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2004, Science.

[6]  P. Gordon,et al.  The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[7]  W Ni,et al.  Anomaly Detection: Eye Movement Patterns , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Readers' Eye Movements Distinguish Anomalies of Form and Content , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[10]  David J. Hess,et al.  Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension , 1995 .

[11]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study , 1998 .

[12]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[13]  G. Altmann,et al.  The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements , 2003 .

[14]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[15]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .