Epigenetic Hypothesis Tests for Methylation and Acetylation in a Triple Microarray System

To fully elucidate the functional relationship between DNA methylation and histone hypoacetylation in gene silencing, we have developed an integrated "triple" microarray system that allows us to begin to decipher the influence of epigenetic hierarchies on the regulation of gene expression in cancer cells. Our hypothesis is that in the promoter region of a silenced gene, reversal of two epigenetic factors (i.e., DNA demethylation and/or histone hyperacetylation) is highly correlated with gene reexpression after treatment of the human epithelial ovarian cancer cell line CP70 with the drug combination 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (DAC), a demethylating agent, and trichostatin A (TSA), an inhibitor of histone deacetylases. To estimate the posterior probabilities for genes with altered expression, DNA methylation and histone acetylation status measured with a triple-microarray system, we have employed an established empirical Bayes model. Two methods have been proposed to test our hypothesis that DNA demethylation and histone hyperacetylation are highly correlated among those up-regulated genes. One method follows a weighted least squares regression, while the other is derived from a chi-square statistic. The data derived by these approaches, which have been further verified through bootstrap analyses, support the proposed epigenetic correlation (p-values are less than 0.001). Further simulations suggest that even if the constant variance and normality assumptions do not hold, the power of those two tests is robust.

[1]  Tim Hui-Ming Huang,et al.  Triple analysis of the cancer epigenome: an integrated microarray system for assessing gene expression, DNA methylation, and histone acetylation. , 2003, Cancer research.

[2]  Gary A. Churchill,et al.  Analysis of Variance for Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[3]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias , 2003, Bioinform..

[4]  Tim Hui-Ming Huang,et al.  Expressed CpG island sequence tag microarray for dual screening of DNA hypermethylation and gene silencing in cancer cells. , 2002, Cancer research.

[5]  David M. Rocke,et al.  A Model for Measurement Error for Gene Expression Arrays , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[6]  Christina Kendziorski,et al.  On Differential Variability of Expression Ratios: Improving Statistical Inference about Gene Expression Changes from Microarray Data , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[7]  G. Churchill.  Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[8]  Rachel Jones,et al.  Behavioural genetics: Worms gang up on bacteria , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  Kevin R. Coombes,et al.  Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes in cDNA Microarray Experiments , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[10]  S. Weisberg,et al.  Applied Linear Regression (2nd ed.). , 1986 .

[11]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[12]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  C M Kendziorski,et al.  On parametric empirical Bayes methods for comparing multiple groups using replicated gene expression profiles , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Matty P. Weijenberg,et al.  A genomic screen for genes upregulated by demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in human colorectal cancer , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[15]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. , 2000, Science.

[16]  Malik Beshir Malik,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005, Technometrics.

[17]  John D. Storey,et al.  Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment , 2001 .

[18]  Y. Chen,et al.  Ratio-based decisions and the quantitative analysis of cDNA microarray images. , 1997, Journal of biomedical optics.

[19]  J. Herman,et al.  Synergy of demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in the re-expression of genes silenced in cancer , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[20]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[21]  Tim Hui-Ming Huang,et al.  Isolating human transcription factor targets by coupling chromatin immunoprecipitation and CpG island microarray analysis. , 2002, Genes & development.

[22]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Deepayan Sarkar,et al.  Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method. , 2004, Biostatistics.

[24]  C. M. Chen,et al.  Dissecting complex epigenetic alterations in breast cancer using CpG island microarrays. , 2001, Cancer research.

[25]  S. Dudoit,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED GENES IN REPLICATED cDNA MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS , 2002 .

[26]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.