Cheiloscopic Study among Monozygotic Twins, Non-Twin Brothers and Non-Relative Individuals.

This study aimed to investigate cheiloscopic patterns among monozygotic twins (MT), non-twin siblings (NTS) and unrelated individuals (UI). The sample consisted of 20 pairs of monozygotic twins (G1), 20 pairs of non-twin siblings (G2) and 20 pairs of unrelated individuals (G3). Lip thickness, commissures and grooves were evaluated and the latter were classified as: I - clear-cut vertical grooves; I' - incomplete vertical grooves; II - branched grooves; III - intersecting; IV - reticular grooves and V - undetermined, in 8 labial regions (sub-quadrants). The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with a 5% significance level. Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) and Kappa coefficient, with a 95% confidence interval, were employed to check for agreement rates between G1, G2 and G3 pairs. There was a weak correlation for lip thickness (<0.90) in the total group, with higher values in G1 (CCC from 0.25 to 0.83 and from 0.34 to 0.86, upper and lower lips, respectively), followed by G2 (CCC from -0.03 to 0.70 and from -0.21 to 0.62, upper and lower lips, respectively) and G3 (CCC from -0.25 to 0.56 and from -0.38 to 0.34, upper and lower lips, respectively). With regard to labial commissures, Kappa statistic values were found to be 1.00 for G1, 0.45 for G2 and -0.24 for G3. As for the main groove pattern by sub-quadrant, Kappa values ranged from 0.48 to 0.87 for G1, from 0.17 to 0.59 for G2, and from -0.18 to 0.19 for G3. Monozygotic twins presented a relevant percentage of cheiloscopic agreements. Similarities were also found among NTS, while UI showed greater differences compared to their pairs, highlighting the influence of hereditary relationships on inherited cheiloscopic features.

[1]  Lara Maria Herrera,et al.  Human identification by means of conventional and digital Cheiloscopy: a study of the literature , 2013 .

[2]  M. David,et al.  Cheiloscopy: An aid for personal identification , 2011, Journal of forensic dental sciences.

[3]  Magda Ahmed El Domiaty,et al.  Morphological patterns of lip prints in Saudi Arabia at Almadinah Almonawarah province. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[4]  Hajime Utsuno,et al.  Preliminary study of post mortem identification using lip prints. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[5]  M. Carmen.,et al.  Nuevas aportaciones al procesado de huellas labiales. Los lisocromos en queiloscopia. , 2004 .

[6]  L. W. Russell,et al.  Analysis of lipsticks , 1984 .

[7]  H. Goedde,et al.  Lip prints ? Variability and genetics , 1977 .

[8]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[9]  Anila Koneru,et al.  Comparison of lip prints in two different populations of India: Reflections based on a preliminary examination , 2013, Journal of forensic dental sciences.

[10]  A. Kamath,et al.  Utility of cheiloscopy, rugoscopy, and dactyloscopy for human identification in a defined cohort , 2013, Journal of forensic dental sciences.

[11]  S. Sandhu,et al.  Study of lip print pattern in a Punjabi population , 2012, Journal of forensic dental sciences.

[12]  R. Prabhu,et al.  Cheiloscopy: Revisited , 2012, Journal of forensic dental sciences.

[13]  G. Mahon A Proposal for Strength-of-Agreement Criteria for Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient , 2005 .

[14]  Y. Tsuchihashi,et al.  Two criminal cases on lip print , 1975 .

[15]  Y Tsuchihashi,et al.  Studies on personal identification by means of lip prints. , 1974, Forensic science.