Kantorovich-Rubinstein misfit for inverting gravity-gradient data by the level-set method

We have developed a novel Kantorovich-Rubinstein (KR) norm-based misfit function to measure the mismatch between gravity-gradient data for the inverse gradiometry problem. Under the assumption that an anomalous mass body has an unknown compact support with a prescribed constant value of density contrast, we implicitly parameterize the unknown mass body by a level-set function. Because the geometry of an underlying anomalous mass body may experience various changes during inversion in terms of level-set evolution, the classic least-squares ([Formula: see text]-norm-based) and the [Formula: see text]-norm-based misfit functions for governing the level-set evolution may potentially induce local minima if an initial guess of the level-set function is far from that of the target model. The KR norm from the optimal transport theory computes the data misfit by comparing the modeled data and the measured data in a global manner, leading to better resolution of the differences between the inverted model and the target model. Combining the KR norm with the level-set method yields a new effective methodology that is not only able to mitigate local minima but is also robust against random noise for the inverse gradiometry problem. Numerical experiments further demonstrate that the new KR norm-based misfit function is able to recover deep dipping flanks of SEG/EAGE salt models even at extremely low signal-to-noise ratios. The new methodology can be readily applied to gravity and magnetic data as well.

[1]  Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb,et al.  Imaging with Kantorovich-Rubinstein Discrepancy , 2014, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[2]  Michael S. Zhdanov,et al.  Three-dimensional regularized focusing inversion of gravity gradient tensor component data , 2004 .

[3]  Michael S. Zhdanov,et al.  Focusing geophysical inversion images , 1999 .

[4]  O. Dorn,et al.  Level set methods for inverse scattering , 2006 .

[5]  J. Qian,et al.  A multiple level-set method for 3D inversion of magnetic data , 2017 .

[6]  Yaoguo Li 3-D Inversion of Gravity Gradiometer Data , 2001 .

[7]  F. Condi,et al.  Resolution And Efficient Inversion of Gravity Gradiometry , 1999 .

[8]  Brittany D. Froese,et al.  Application of the Wasserstein metric to seismic signals , 2013, 1311.4581.

[9]  J. Kisabeth,et al.  Joint 3-D Inversion of Gravity, Magnetic and Tensor Gravity Fields For Imaging Salt Formations in the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico , 2000 .

[10]  Shingyu Leung,et al.  A THREE-DIMENSIONAL INVERSE GRAVIMETRY PROBLEM FOR ICE WITH SNOW CAPS , 2013 .

[11]  C. Villani Topics in Optimal Transportation , 2003 .

[12]  G. F. Roach,et al.  Inverse problems and imaging , 1991 .

[13]  3D Inversion of Airborne Gravity Gradiomentry For Iron Ore Exploration In Brazil , 2010 .

[14]  K. Kubik,et al.  Compact gravity inversion , 1983 .

[15]  Jean-David Benamou,et al.  Mixed L2-Wasserstein Optimal Mapping Between Prescribed Density Functions , 2001 .

[16]  Yaoguo Li Processing Gravity Gradiometer Data Using an Equivalent Source Technique , 2001 .

[17]  Jean Virieux,et al.  An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics , 2009 .

[18]  X. Li Efficient 3D Gravity and Magnetic Modeling , 2010 .

[19]  Brittany D. Froese,et al.  Optimal Transport for Seismic Full Waveform Inversion , 2016, 1602.01540.

[20]  Shingyu Leung,et al.  A Fast Local Level Set Method for Inverse Gravimetry , 2011 .

[21]  R. Plessix A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications , 2006 .

[22]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[23]  Yaoguo Li,et al.  Inversion of gravity data using a binary formulation , 2006 .

[24]  D. Jackson Interpretation of Inaccurate, Insufficient and Inconsistent Data , 1972 .

[25]  Yaoguo Li,et al.  3D inversion of airborne gravity gradiometry data in mineral exploration: A case study in the Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Brazil , 2013 .

[26]  Jianliang Qian,et al.  A local level-set method for 3D inversion of gravity-gradient data , 2015 .

[27]  Jianliang Qian,et al.  Joint inversion of gravity and traveltime data using a level-set-based structural parameterization , 2016 .

[28]  J. Virieux,et al.  Measuring the misfit between seismograms using an optimal transport distance: application to full waveform inversion , 2016 .

[29]  Shingyu Leung,et al.  AN IMPROVED FAST LOCAL LEVEL SET METHOD FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL INVERSE GRAVIMETRY , 2015 .

[30]  C. Farquharson,et al.  Multiple level-set joint inversion of traveltime and gravity data with application to ore delineation: A synthetic study , 2018 .

[31]  J. Qian,et al.  A level-set method for imaging salt structures using gravity data , 2016 .

[32]  Roland Glowinski,et al.  Variational methods for the numerical solution of nonlinear elliptic problems , 2015, CBMS-NSF regional conference series in applied mathematics.

[33]  G. Barnes,et al.  Imaging geologic surfaces by inverting gravity gradient data with depth horizons , 2012 .

[34]  Victor Isakov,et al.  Inverse Source Problems , 1990 .

[35]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  3-D inversion of gravity data , 1998 .

[36]  Jianliang Qian,et al.  An adjoint state method for three-dimensional transmission traveltime tomography using first-arrivals , 2006 .