Catching-Up and Falling Behind: Knowledge Spillover from American to German Machine Toolmakers

In our days, German machine tool makers accuse their Chinese competitors of violating patent rights and illegally imitating German technology. A century ago, however, German machine tool makers used exactly the same methods to imitate American technology. To understand the dynamics of this catching-up process we use patent statistics to analyze firms' activities between 1877 and 1932. We show that German machine tool makers successfully deployed imitating and counterfeiting activities in the late 19th century and the 1920s to catchup to their American competitors. The German administration supported this strategy by stipulating a patent law that discriminated against foreign patent holders and probably also by delaying the granting of patents to foreign applicants. Parallel to the growing international competitiveness of German firms, however, the willingness to guarantee intellectual property rights of foreigners was also increasing because German firms had now to fear retaliatory measures in their own export markets when violating foreign property rights within Germany.

[1]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[2]  P. Aghion Higher Education and Innovation , 2008 .

[3]  John McDermott,et al.  Industrial Development and the Convergence Question , 1998 .

[4]  Christoph Buccheim What causes successful late development?Insights from history , 2006 .

[5]  Harald Degner Schumpeterian German Firms before an after World War I. The Innovative Few and Non-innovative Many , 2009 .

[6]  Jochen Streb Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Schumpeterschen Diversifizierung , 2001 .

[7]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence From Patent Records, 1790–1846 , 1988, The Journal of Economic History.

[8]  S. Lenway,et al.  Knowledge and competitive advantage, the coevolution of firms, technology and national institutions , 2003 .

[9]  M. Seckelmann Industrialisierung, Internationalisierung und Patentrecht im Deutschen Reich, 1871–1914 , 2006 .

[10]  Innovation in the Machine Tool Industry , 1957 .

[11]  David K. Levine,et al.  Against Intellectual Monopoly , 2008 .

[12]  Morgan Kelly Technological Progress Under Learning by Imitation , 2009 .

[13]  Shuxing Yin,et al.  Technological and Geographical Knowledge Spillover in the German Empire 18771918 , 2006 .

[14]  Shuxing Yin,et al.  Knowledge spill-over from new to old industries: The case of German synthetic dyes and textiles (1878–1913) , 2007 .

[15]  Output, Employment, and Productivity in the United States after 1800 , 1966 .

[16]  Shuxing Yin,et al.  What made southwest German firms innovative around 1900? Assessing the importance of intra- and inter-industry externalities , 2007 .

[17]  Masaaki Kotabe,et al.  A Comparative Study of U.S. and Japanese Patent Systems , 1992 .

[18]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[19]  C. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions , 2005 .

[20]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. , 1991 .

[21]  International technology transfer : Europe, Japan and the USA, 1700-1914 , 1993 .

[22]  M. Abramovitz Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind , 1986, The Journal of Economic History.

[23]  Richard J. Sullivan Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in Great Britain and Ireland, 1852-1876 , 1994 .

[24]  Harald Degner Windows of technological opportunity: do technological booms influence the relationship between firm size and innovativeness? , 2010 .

[25]  Petra Moser,et al.  How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World Fairs , 2003 .

[26]  A. Tooze,et al.  The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy , 2006 .

[27]  Jochen Streb,et al.  Technological Creativity and Cheap Labour? Explaining the Growing International Competitiveness of German Mechanical Engineering before World War I , 2008 .

[28]  Ross M. Robertson Changing Production of Metalworking Machinery, 1860–1920 , 1966 .

[29]  W. P. Yen,et al.  A Comparative Study of U.S.-Japan Seismic Design of Highway Bridges: II. Shake-Table Model Tests , 2003 .

[30]  J. Christ New Economic Geography Reloaded: Localized Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation , 2008 .

[31]  Monte A. Calvert,et al.  The U.S. Machine Tool Industry from 1900–1950 by Harless D. Wagoner (review) , 1971, Technology and Culture.

[32]  Sheilagh Ogilvie,et al.  Germany : a new social and economic history , 1996 .

[33]  Petra Moser,et al.  Do Patents Weaken the Localization of Innovations? Evidence from World's Fairs , 2010 .

[34]  R. Sylla,et al.  Founding Choices: American Economic Policy in the 1790s , 2010 .

[35]  D. Landes The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present , 1969 .

[36]  Harald Degner Do technological booms matter? New evidence on the relationship between firm size and innovativeness , 2011 .

[37]  Steffen Otterbach,et al.  Mismatches Between Actual and Preferred Work Time: Empirical Evidence of Hours Constraints in 21 Countries , 2010 .

[38]  Carsten Burhop,et al.  The Transfer of Patents in Imperial Germany , 2009, The Journal of Economic History.