Poisson Point Processes for Solving Stochastic Inverse Problems in Fluorescence Microscopy

Despite revolutionary developments in fluorescence based optical microscopy imaging, the quality of the images remains fundamentally limited by diffraction and noise. Hence, deconvolution methods are often applied to obtain better estimates of the biological structures than the measured images are providing prima facie, by reducing blur and noise as much as possible through image postprocessing. However, conventional deconvolution methods typically focus on accurately modeling the point-spread function of the microscope, and put less emphasis on properly modeling the noise sources. Here we propose a new approach to enhancing fluorescence microscopy images by formulating deconvolution as a stochastic inverse problem. We solve the problem using Poisson point processes and establish a connection between the classical Shepp-Vardi algorithm and probability hypothesis density filtering. Results of preliminary experiments on image data from various biological applications indicate that the proposed method compares favorably with existing approaches in jointly performing deblurring and denoising.

[1]  M. Unser,et al.  The colored revolution of bioimaging , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  J. Zerubia,et al.  Gaussian approximations of fluorescence microscope point-spread function models. , 2007, Applied optics.

[3]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics , 2012 .

[4]  R. Mahler Multitarget Bayes filtering via first-order multitarget moments , 2003 .

[5]  William J. Godinez,et al.  Objective comparison of particle tracking methods , 2014, Nature Methods.

[6]  P Topor,et al.  Increasing axial resolution of 3D data sets using deconvolution algorithms , 2011, Journal of microscopy.

[7]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Bayesian imaging using Good's roughness measure-implementation on a massively parallel processor , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[8]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[9]  A. Nehorai,et al.  Deconvolution methods for 3-D fluorescence microscopy images , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  Roy L. Streit PHD intensity filtering is one step of a MAP estimation algorithm for positron emission tomography , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[11]  Hung T. Nguyen,et al.  Random sets : theory and applications , 1997 .

[12]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[13]  Suliana Manley,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of software packages for single-molecule localization microscopy , 2015, Nature Methods.

[14]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Roy L. Streit,et al.  Poisson Point Processes: Imaging, Tracking, and Sensing , 2010 .