Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Management of novel ecosystems : are novel approaches required ?

Most ecosystems are now sufficiently altered in structure and function to qualify as novel systems, and this recognition should be the starting point for ecosystem management efforts. Under the emerging biogeochemical configurations, management activities are experiments, blurring the line between basic and applied research. Responses to specific management manipulations are context specific, influenced by the current status or structure of the system, and this necessitates reference areas for management or restoration activities. Attempts to return systems to within their historical range of biotic and abiotic characteristics and processes may not be possible, and management activities directed at removing undesirable features of novel ecosystems may perpetuate or create such ecosystems. Management actions should attempt to maintain genetic and species diversity and encourage the biogeochemical characteristics that favor desirable species. Few resources currently exist to support the addition of proactive measures and rigorous experimental designs to current management activities. The necessary changes will not occur without strong input from stakeholders and policy makers, so rapid information transfer and proactive research–management activities by the scientific community are needed.

[1]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Policy strategies to address sustainability of Alaskan boreal forests in response to a directionally changing climate , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  T. Seastedt,et al.  Effects of Nutrient Manipulations and Grass Removal on Cover, Species Composition, and Invasibility of a Novel Grassland in Colorado , 2009 .

[3]  Alan K. Knapp,et al.  Grassland dynamics : long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie , 1998 .

[4]  J. Denslow,et al.  After biocontrol: assessing indirect effects of insect releases , 2005 .

[5]  R. Haynes,et al.  Adaptive Management of Forest Ecosystems: Did Some Rubber Hit the Road? , 2007 .

[6]  T. T. Veblen,et al.  Fire, fuels and restoration of ponderosa pine–Douglas fir forests in the Rocky Mountains, USA , 2007 .

[7]  K. Gross,et al.  Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  D. Richardson,et al.  Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order , 2006 .

[9]  J. Ehrenfeld Effects of Exotic Plant Invasions on Soil Nutrient Cycling Processes , 2003, Ecosystems.

[10]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Ecological Restoration and Global Climate Change , 2006 .

[11]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE USE OF NATURAL VARIABILITY CONCEPTS IN MANAGING ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[12]  A. Starfield,et al.  TIME LAGS AND NOVEL ECOSYSTEMS IN RESPONSE TO TRANSIENT CLIMATIC CHANGE IN ARCTIC ALASKA , 1997 .

[13]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  What are invasive species , 2009 .

[14]  T. Kitzberger,et al.  Climatic and human influences on fire regimes in ponderosa pine forests in the Colorado Front Range. , 2000 .

[15]  C. S. Holling Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems , 2001, Ecosystems.

[16]  A. MacDougall,et al.  ARE INVASIVE SPECIES THE DRIVERS OR PASSENGERS OF CHANGE IN DEGRADED ECOSYSTEMS , 2005 .

[17]  M. Price Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2003 .

[18]  D. Hartnett,et al.  Vegetation trends in tallgrass prairie from bison and cattle grazing , 2005 .

[19]  N. W. Callan,et al.  Decline of spotted knapweed density at two sites in western Montana with large populations of the introduced root weevil, Cyphocleonus achates (Fahraeus) , 2006 .

[20]  D. Fox,et al.  Back to the No-Analog Future? , 2007, Science.

[21]  C. Rio Changes in understory composition following catastrophic windthrow and salvage logging in a subalpine forest ecosystem , 2006 .

[22]  G. Likens,et al.  Changes in nitrogen cycling during the past century in a northern hardwood forest , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  T. Koontz,et al.  Theory into Practice: Implementing Ecosystem Management Objectives in the USDA Forest Service , 2005, Environmental management.

[24]  William L. Baker,et al.  Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States , 2006 .

[25]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[26]  John E. Kutzbach,et al.  Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  R. Hobbs,et al.  What happens if we cannot fix it?: Triage, palliative care and setting priorities in salinising landscapes , 2003 .

[28]  T. Seastedt,et al.  Plant Community Response to the Decline of Diffuse Knapweed in a Colorado Grassland , 2007, Ecological Restoration.

[29]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[30]  W. Reid,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[31]  T. Seastedt,et al.  Interactions and effects of multiple biological control insects on diffuse and spotted knapweed in the Front Range of Colorado , 2007 .

[32]  P. Beier,et al.  Recommendations for Integrating Restoration Ecology and Conservation Biology in Ponderosa Pine Forests of the Southwestern United States , 2006 .