The different representational frameworks underpinning abstract and concrete knowledge: Evidence from odd-one-out judgements

Recent evidence from neuropsychological investigations of individuals with global aphasia and deep or deep-phonological dyslexia suggests that abstract and concrete concepts are underpinned by qualitatively different representational frameworks. Abstract words are represented primarily by their association to other words, whilst concrete words are represented primarily by their taxonomic similarity to one another. In the current study, we present the first evidence for this association/similarity distinction to be gathered from healthy research participants. Using a semantic odd-one-out task, it is shown that normal participants identify associative connections more quickly than similarity-based connections when processing abstract words, but that the pattern is reversed for concrete words. It is also demonstrated that the typical concrete-word advantage observed in many cognitive tasks is abolished and even reversed when participants have to comprehend the semantic associations between words. The data provide converging evidence for the different representational frameworks hypothesis and suggest that claims based on information from previous neuropsychological investigations can be generalized to normal cognition.

[1]  J. Raven.  Coloured progressive matrices : sets A, Ab, B , 1956 .

[2]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Michael W. Eysenck,et al.  Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Sentences. , 1973 .

[4]  J. Marshall,et al.  Patterns of paralexia: a psycholinguistic approach. , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[5]  E. Warrington.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory , 2022 .

[6]  C. T. James.  The Role of Semantic Information in Lexical Decisions. , 1975 .

[7]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Comprehension and Recall of Abstract and Concrete Sentences. , 1976 .

[8]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[9]  E K Warrington,et al.  Concrete word dyslexia. , 1981, British journal of psychology.

[10]  E. Shoben,et al.  Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials , 1983 .

[11]  Gregory V. Jones.  Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication , 1985, Brain and Language.

[12]  R. W. Stowe,et al.  Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words , 1988 .

[13]  Paula J. Schwanenflugel,et al.  Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. , 1989 .

[14]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Deep dysphasia: Analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder , 1990, Brain and Language.

[15]  A. Sirigu,et al.  The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Tim Shallice,et al.  EFFECTS OF WORD ABSTRACTNESS IN A CONNECTIONIST MODEL OF DEEP DYSLEXIA , 1991 .

[17]  E K Warrington,et al.  Cognitive retardation in a patient with preservation of psychomotor speed. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[18]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[19]  S. Breedin.  Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia , 1994 .

[20]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[21]  S. Scott,et al.  Noun imageability and the temporal lobes , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Christopher Barry,et al.  When Does a Deep Dyslexic Make a Semantic Error? The Roles of Age-of-Acquisition, Concreteness, and Frequency , 2000, Brain and Language.

[23]  Michael Wilson.  MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 2001 .

[24]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Reply to Strain, Patterson, and Seidenberg (2002). , 2002 .

[25]  A. Ellis,et al.  What exactly interacts with spelling-sound consistency in word naming? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Theories of word naming interact with spelling-sound consistency. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access , 2002 .

[28]  E. Warrington,et al.  Preservation of Propositional Speech in a Pure Anomic: The Importance of an Abstract Vocabulary , 2003, Neurocase.

[29]  S. Gerhand,et al.  Both concreteness and age-of-acquisition affect reading accuracy but only concreteness affects comprehension in a deep dyslexic patient , 2003, Brain and Language.

[30]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Uta Noppeney,et al.  Retrieval of abstract semantics , 2004, NeuroImage.

[32]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  E. Warrington,et al.  Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  R. Johnston,et al.  Age of acquisition and lexical processing , 2006 .

[35]  S. Crutch,et al.  Qualitatively Different Semantic Representations for Abstract and Concrete Words: Further Evidence from the Semantic Reading Errors of Deep Dyslexic Patients , 2006, Neurocase.

[36]  E. Warrington,et al.  Partial knowledge of abstract words in patients with cortical degenerative conditions. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[37]  E. Warrington,et al.  The Different Frameworks Underlying Abstract and Concrete Knowledge: Evidence from a Bilingual Patient with a Semantic Refractory Access Dysphasia , 2006, Neurocase.

[38]  Sebastian J. Crutch,et al.  Neural Basis of Semantic Memory: Semantic refractory access disorders , 2007 .

[39]  Sabine Weiss,et al.  Neuronal coupling during the comprehension of concrete and abstract sentences , 2007 .

[40]  Bradley G. Goodyear,et al.  Neural Correlates of Concreteness in Semantic Categorization , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Jamie Reilly,et al.  Formal Distinctiveness of High- and Low-Imageability Nouns: Analyses and Theoretical Implications , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[42]  E. Warrington,et al.  Semantic priming in deep-phonological dyslexia: Contrasting effects of association and similarity upon abstract and concrete word reading , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[43]  Thomas Witzel,et al.  Spatiotemporal cortical dynamics underlying abstract and concrete word reading , 2007, Human brain mapping.