Document Quality Estimation Using Spatial Frequency Response

The current Document Image Quality Assessment (DIQA) algorithms directly relate the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) accuracies with the quality of the document to build supervised learning frameworks. This direct correlation has two major limitations: (a) OCR may be affected by factors independent of the quality of the capture and (b) it cannot account for blur variations within an image. An alternate possibility is to quantify the quality of capture using human judgement, however, it is subjective and prone to error. In this work, we build upon the idea of Spatial Frequency Response (SFR) to reliably quantify the quality of a document image. We present through quantitative and qualitative experiments that the proposed metric leads to significant improvement in document quality prediction in contrast to using OCR as ground truth.

[1]  David S. Doermann,et al.  A Dataset for Quality Assessment of Camera Captured Document Images , 2013, CBDAR.

[2]  Jean-Marc Ogier,et al.  Combining Focus Measure Operators to Predict OCR Accuracy in Mobile-Captured Document Images , 2014, 2014 11th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems.

[3]  Vineet Gandhi,et al.  Document blur detection using edge profile mining , 2016, ICVGIP '16.

[4]  Xujun Peng,et al.  Automated image quality assessment for camera-captured OCR , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[5]  Le Kang,et al.  A deep learning approach to document image quality assessment , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[6]  Parikshit Sakurikar,et al.  Beyond OCRs for Document Blur Estimation , 2017, 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR).

[7]  Peter D. Burns,et al.  Slanted-Edge MTF for Digital Camera and Scanner Analysis , 2000, PICS.

[8]  Don R. Williams,et al.  Benchmarking of the ISO 12233 Slanted-edge Spatial Frequency Response Plug-in , 1998, PICS.

[9]  Zhou Wang,et al.  No-reference image sharpness assessment based on local phase coherence measurement , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[10]  David S. Doermann,et al.  Sharpness estimation for document and scene images , 2012, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012).

[11]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Stephen E. Reichenbach,et al.  Characterizing digital image acquisition devices , 1991 .

[13]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Wei-Feng Hsu,et al.  Measurement of the spatial frequency response (SFR) of digital still-picture cameras using a modified slanted-edge method , 2000, SPIE Photonics Taiwan.

[15]  David S. Doermann,et al.  Unsupervised feature learning framework for no-reference image quality assessment , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[16]  Lina J. Karam,et al.  A No-Reference Objective Image Sharpness Metric Based on the Notion of Just Noticeable Blur (JNB) , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.