Dissociable mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff during visual perceptual learning are revealed by a hierarchical drift-diffusion model

Two phenomena are commonly observed in decision-making. First, there is a speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) such that decisions are slower and more accurate when instructions emphasize accuracy over speed, and vice versa. Second, decision performance improves with practice, as a task is learnt. The SAT and learning effects have been explained under a well-established evidence-accumulation framework for decision-making, which suggests that evidence supporting each choice is accumulated over time, and a decision is committed to when the accumulated evidence reaches a decision boundary. This framework suggests that changing the decision boundary creates the tradeoff between decision speed and accuracy, while increasing the rate of accumulation leads to more accurate and faster decisions after learning. However, recent studies challenged the view that SAT and learning are associated with changes in distinct, single decision parameters. Further, the influence of speed-accuracy instructions over the course of learning remains largely unknown. Here, we used a hierarchical drift-diffusion model to examine the SAT during learning of a coherent motion discrimination task across multiple training sessions, and a transfer test session. The influence of speed-accuracy instructions was robust over training and generalized across untrained stimulus features. Emphasizing decision accuracy rather than speed was associated with increased boundary separation, drift rate and non-decision time at the beginning of training. However, after training, an emphasis on decision accuracy was only associated with increased boundary separation. In addition, faster and more accurate decisions after learning were due to a gradual decrease in boundary separation and an increase in drift rate. The results suggest that speed-accuracy instructions and learning differentially shape decision-making processes at different time scales.

[1]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[2]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Aging and response times: a comparison of sequential sampling models , 2005 .

[4]  D. Scott Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[5]  J. Andel Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[7]  Jiaxiang Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Evidence Bounds on Decision-Making: Theoretical and Empirical Developments , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Do Humans Produce the Speed–accuracy Trade-off That Maximizes Reward Rate? , 2022 .

[9]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  Learning Alters the Tuning of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Patterns for Visual Forms , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Brix Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[11]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[12]  Z. Mainen,et al.  Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[14]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Perceptual learning without perception , 2001, Nature.

[15]  Daphna Weinshall,et al.  Mechanisms of generalization in perceptual learning , 1998, Vision Research.

[16]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.

[17]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Link,et al.  A sequential theory of psychological discrimination , 1975 .

[20]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[21]  Y. Stern,et al.  Neural networks associated with the speed-accuracy tradeoff: Evidence from the response signal method , 2011, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  M. Fahle Perceptual learning: specificity versus generalization , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[24]  A. Osman,et al.  On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  R. Ratcliff A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[27]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Account of Criterion Shifts in the Lexical Decision Task. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[28]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[29]  A. Voss,et al.  Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[30]  James B. Rowe,et al.  Selection and inhibition mechanisms for human voluntary action decisions , 2012, NeuroImage.

[31]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  R. Marois,et al.  fMRI Evidence for a Dual Process Account of the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Decision-Making , 2008, PloS one.

[33]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  C. Law,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual learning in a sensory-motor, but not a sensory, cortical area , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  What a difference a parameter makes: A psychophysical comparison of random dot motion algorithms , 2009, Vision Research.

[36]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  An R package for single-case randomization tests , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[37]  H. Engeland,et al.  Basic Impairments in Regulating the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Predict Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[38]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Domain General Mechanisms of Perceptual Decision Making in Human Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Role of Context in Perceptual Learning in Maze Discriminations , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[40]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Dissociable Perceptual-learning Mechanisms Revealed by Diffusion-model Analysis , 2022 .

[42]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[43]  M. Stone Models for choice-reaction time , 1960 .

[44]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Cooperation, Competition, and Team Performance: Toward a Contingency Approach , 2003 .

[47]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: empirical tests of theoretical predictions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[49]  Andrew M. Saxe,et al.  Acquisition of decision making criteria: reward rate ultimately beats accuracy , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[50]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Neural Representations of Relevant and Irrelevant Features in Perceptual Decision Making , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Philip Holmes,et al.  Rapid decision threshold modulation by reward rate in a neural network , 2006, Neural Networks.

[52]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[53]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  Elisabeth J. Ploran,et al.  Evidence Accumulation and the Moment of Recognition: Dissociating Perceptual Recognition Processes Using fMRI , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[57]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The Effect of Perceptual Learning on Neuronal Responses in Monkey Visual Area V4 , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  A. Osman,et al.  Mechanisms of speed–accuracy tradeoff: evidence from covert motor processes , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[59]  Hiroaki Masaki,et al.  The functional locus of the lateralized readiness potential. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[60]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  W. Sommer,et al.  Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[62]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  Noise, cost and speed-accuracy trade-offs: decision-making in a decentralized system , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[63]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Dissociable Perceptual Learning Mechanisms Revealed by Diffusion-Model Analysis , 2011 .

[64]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[65]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  The Neural and Computational Basis of Controlled Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff during Task Performance , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[67]  James O. Berger,et al.  The interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis , 2004 .

[68]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[70]  C. Furmanski,et al.  Learning Strengthens the Response of Primary Visual Cortex to Simple Patterns , 2004, Current Biology.

[71]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  David Lindley,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics from a Bayesian Viewpoint , 1966 .

[73]  Eugene S. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[74]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy , 2009 .

[75]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Psychophysics: Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy , 2003, Nature.

[76]  C. S. Green,et al.  Action video game modifies visual selective attention , 2003, Nature.

[77]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  A ballistic model of choice response time. , 2005, Psychological review.

[78]  Miranda Robertson,et al.  Neural systems , 1977, Nature.

[79]  J. F. Schouten,et al.  Reaction time and accuracy. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[80]  Clas Blomberg § 32 – THE NEURAL SYSTEM , 2007 .

[81]  Hugh Coolican Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology , 1993 .

[82]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[83]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 2005 .

[84]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[85]  M. Lee,et al.  Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[86]  D. Koshland Frontiers in neuroscience. , 1988, Science.

[87]  Lin Yang,et al.  Perceptual Learning Increases the Strength of the Earliest Signals in Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[88]  P. Fitts Cognitive aspects of information processing. 3. Set for speed versus accuracy. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[89]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Neural Activity in Macaque Parietal Cortex Reflects Temporal Integration of Visual Motion Signals during Perceptual Decision Making , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[90]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[91]  William Mendenhall,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[92]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[93]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[94]  R. Pew,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Reaction Time: Effect of Discrete Criterion Times , 1968 .

[95]  Alexander Libin,et al.  Small N designs for rehabilitation research. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[96]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes , 1998 .

[97]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The effect of speed-accuracy strategy on response interference control in Parkinson's disease , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[98]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[99]  Misha Tsodyks,et al.  Perceptual learning in contrast discrimination: the effect of contrast uncertainty. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[100]  S. Link The relative judgment theory of two choice response time , 1975 .

[101]  G. Logan Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: a test of the instance theory of automaticity. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[102]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[103]  M. Shadlen,et al.  A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[104]  H. Steven Scholte,et al.  Spatial Frequency Information Modulates Response Inhibition and Decision-Making Processes , 2013, PloS one.

[105]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[106]  C. Gilbert,et al.  The Neural Basis of Perceptual Learning , 2001, Neuron.

[107]  M. Shadlen,et al.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[108]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[109]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[110]  S. E. Ahmed,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference , 2008, Technometrics.

[111]  M. Gallagher Psychology and neurobiology: memory and brain. , 1987, Science.

[112]  Zoe Kourtzi,et al.  Learning-dependent plasticity with and without training in the human brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[113]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Cooperation, competition and team performance: Toward a contingency approach , 2002 .

[114]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[115]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The Functional Form of Performance Improvements in Perceptual Learning , 2007, Psychological science.

[116]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Task-related versus stimulus-specific practice. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[117]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[118]  Jeffrey D Schall,et al.  The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[119]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[120]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[121]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Accounting for speed–accuracy tradeoff in perceptual learning , 2012, Vision Research.

[122]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff , 2012, Neuron.