Prostate volume reduction following pure transurethral bipolar plasma vaporization and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective investigation using transrectal 3D ultrasound volumetry

[1]  M. Wroclawski,et al.  ‘Button type’ bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate compared with standard transurethral resection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of short‐term outcome studies , 2016, BJU international.

[2]  S. Shariat,et al.  Long-term follow-up data more than 5 years after surgical management of benign prostate obstruction: who stands the test of time? , 2016, Current opinion in urology.

[3]  Liping Xie,et al.  Bipolar button-electrode plasma vaporization of the prostate: An effective option for patients with post-brachytherapy retention , 2015, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[4]  Alexander Bachmann,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update. , 2015, European Urology.

[5]  G. Robert,et al.  Bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate: ready to replace GreenLight? A systematic review of randomized control trials , 2015, World Journal of Urology.

[6]  O. Aydogdu,et al.  A clinical study comparing BIVAP saline vaporization of the prostate with bipolar TURP in patients with prostate volume 30 to 80 mL: Early complications, physiological changes and postoperative follow-up outcomes. , 2014, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[7]  S. Falahatkar,et al.  Bipolar transurethral vaporization: a superior procedure in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective randomized comparison with bipolar TURP. , 2014, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[8]  B. Geavlete,et al.  Continuous vs conventional bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate and standard monopolar resection: a prospective, randomised comparison of a new technological advance , 2014, BJU international.

[9]  T. Hermanns,et al.  Ablative efficiency of 532-nm laser vaporization compared to transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a prospective three-dimensional ultrasound volumetry study , 2014, World Journal of Urology.

[10]  T. Hermanns,et al.  Pure bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate: the Zürich experience. , 2013, Journal of endourology.

[11]  T. Hermanns,et al.  Prospective evaluation of irrigation fluid absorption during pure transurethral bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate using expired‐breath ethanol measurements , 2013, BJU international.

[12]  J. J. de la Rosette,et al.  Midterm results from an international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. , 2013, European urology.

[13]  Xiao-feng Wang,et al.  Efficacy and safety of bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate with "button-type" electrode compared with transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 2012, Chinese medical journal.

[14]  A. De la taille,et al.  Transurethral plasma vaporization of the prostate: 3‐month functional outcome and complications , 2012, BJU international.

[15]  B. Geavlete,et al.  Bipolar plasma vaporization vs monopolar and bipolar TURP-A prospective, randomized, long-term comparison. , 2011, Urology.

[16]  B. Geavlete,et al.  115 BIPOLAR PLASMA VAPORIZATION VERSUS MONOPOLAR AND BIPOLAR TURP - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, LONG TERM COMPARISON , 2011 .

[17]  T. Hermanns,et al.  Lithium triborate laser vaporization of the prostate using the 120 W, high performance system laser: high performance all the way? , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[18]  B. Geavlete,et al.  Transurethral resection (TUR) in saline plasma vaporization of the prostate vs standard TUR of the prostate: ‘the better choice’ in benign prostatic hyperplasia? , 2010, BJU international.

[19]  A. Al-Ansari,et al.  GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up. , 2010, European urology.

[20]  C. Stief,et al.  Plasma vaporisation of the prostate: initial clinical results. , 2010, European urology.

[21]  M. Srougi,et al.  Transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: how much should be resected? , 2009, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[22]  C. Stief,et al.  Techniques and long-term results of surgical procedures for BPH. , 2006, European urology.

[23]  O. Halvorsen,et al.  Benign growth of different prostate zones in aging men with slightly elevated PSA in whom prostate cancer has been excluded: a prospective study of 510 patients. , 2003, Urology.

[24]  W. Zuo,et al.  Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels and Density in the Internal and External Glands of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients with Normal or Gray-Zone PSA Levels , 2003, Urologia Internationalis.

[25]  M. Wirth,et al.  Is There a Relationship between the Amount of Tissue Removed at Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Clinical Improvement in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia , 2001, European Urology.

[26]  C. Wakeley.  HERNIA OF THE BLADDER: ITS ETIOLOGY AND TREATMENT: A Report of 40 Cases , 1930 .