National guidelines for smoking cessation in primary care: a literature review and evidence analysis

National guidelines for smoking cessation in primary care can be effective in improving clinical practice. This study assessed which parties are involved in the development of such guidelines worldwide, which national guidelines address primary care, what recommendations are made for primary care settings, and how these recommendations correlate with each other and with current evidence. We identified national guidelines using an online resource. Only the most recent version of a guideline was included. If an English version was not available, we requested a translation or summary of the recommendations from the authors. Two researchers independently extracted data on funding sources, development methodologies, involved parties, and recommendations made within the guidelines. These recommendations were categorised using the pile-sort method. Each recommendation was cross-checked with the latest evidence and was awarded an evidence-rating. We identified 43 guidelines from 39 countries and after exclusion, we analysed 26 guidelines (22 targeting general population, 4 targeted subpopulations). Twelve categories of recommendations for primary care were identified. There was almost universal agreement regarding the need to identify smokers, advice them to quit and offer behavioural and pharmacological quit smoking support. Discrepancies were greatest for specific recommendations regarding behavioural and pharmacological support, which are likely to be due to different interpretations of evidence and/or differences in contextual health environments. Based on these findings, we developed a universal checklist of guideline recommendations as a practice tool for primary care professionals and future guideline developers.Smoking cessation support in primary care: universal guidelines soughtAn international team call for a universal guideline for primary-care practitioners who help patients to stop smoking. Although many nations have such guidelines, no studies have examined whether these guidelines are consistent with the current evidence. Marjolein Verbiest at the National Institute for Health Innovation, The University of Auckland, New Zealand, and co-workers of the International Primary Care Respiratory Group and the National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training reviewed, evaluated and compared 26 national guidelines. Almost all guidelines place importance on identifying smokers, advising them to quit and providing behavioural and medication-based support. However, there were discrepancies in the support offered, which could be due to different interpretations of evidence, costs of medication and cultural differences. The authors offer a checklist for primary care that can inform future universal guidelines suitable for primary care.

[1]  N. Rigotti,et al.  A survey of tobacco dependence treatment services in 121 countries , 2013, Addiction.

[2]  Johannes Brug,et al.  Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among adults: a systematic review of reviews , 2008, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[3]  N. Rigotti,et al.  A survey of tobacco dependence treatment services in 36 countries. , 2009, Addiction.

[4]  V. Beral,et al.  The 21st century hazards of smoking and benefits of stopping: a prospective study of one million women in the UK , 2013, BDJ.

[5]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  J. O'Loughlin,et al.  Pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[7]  L. Stead,et al.  Physician advice for smoking cessation. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[8]  Julie M. Miller The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) , 2002 .

[9]  M. Wakefield,et al.  Uptake and effectiveness of the Australian telephone Quitline service in the context of a mass media campaign , 2003, Tobacco control.

[10]  Pengfei Guo,et al.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2019, Medicine.

[11]  D. Ryan,et al.  Prioritising the respiratory research needs of primary care: the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) e-Delphi exercise. , 2012, Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group.

[12]  R. Machii,et al.  Mortality attributable to tobacco by region based on the WHO Global Report. , 2012, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[13]  R. Courtney,et al.  The Health Consequences of Smoking-50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2014Us Department of Health and Human Services Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for: Critique , 2015 .

[14]  Linda Bauld,et al.  The effectiveness of NHS smoking cessation services: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of public health.

[15]  L. Stead,et al.  Physician advice for smoking cessation. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  Office on Smoking The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General , 2004 .

[17]  D. Levy,et al.  The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard. , 2004, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[18]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[19]  Stacey A. Kenfield,et al.  Smoking and smoking cessation in relation to mortality in women. , 2008, JAMA.

[20]  R. Peto,et al.  Tobacco use in 3 billion individuals from 16 countries: an analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional household surveys , 2012, The Lancet.

[21]  J M Grimshaw,et al.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. , 1994, Lancet.

[22]  A. Taylor-Vaisey,et al.  Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.